Should America start a war with Iran, North Korea or Syria next?

Question

We've only got 400 days left. Should the USA just attack all three and let the Democrats sort the mess out later?

Later: Umm... I think some people need a sarcasm detector.

Answer 1

You are so clever!!!

Answer 2

Why do you say only 400 days, what significance is that in determining the moral requirement in undertaking another front against radical islam?

If I were a gambling man I would say Iran, but it would hurt us more than help us. On a daily basis Iran is on the verge of civil war, the people do not like being used as cannon fodder for the radical islamists in charge.

If Iran can provoke an attack it will, because an attack will create an aura of solidarity against the attackers and help stave off the revolution that is coming to Iran. Revolution is not a matter of if, it is only a matter of when, and we need to help those who want to take down the radical islamists.

Answer 3

Yes, Yes, and Yes. The Republicans I don't think will attack. I heard a lot more talk of an attack from the Democrat side. So yes since it would be the Democrats doing the attacking they will have to sort it out. Follow the Democrat candidates more closely. Listen to what they say. They are talking tough against those nations you mention plus Saudi Arabia

Answer 4

Why would we do that? North Korea has been falling into line and we already have plenty of troops on the border, so I'm okay with the status quo on that issue. Iran is still being worked through the UN in a united front of the voting members. Syria is being worked through diplomatic negotiation between Iraq and Syria as it should. All liberals are good at is taxing and appeasement, so I don't think we can afford to let them have too much to do. It costs us too much in money and American lives cleaning up their messes.

Answer 5

The problem with N. Korea is well on it's way to being solved. And I don't think it makes a difference between the other two, they both want to bring America down and we are fighting a proxy war with them already. So there is really nothing to start -- we need to finish it.

Answer 6

None of those. i might look ahead to the surgical invasion of a small usa that could no longer come on the brink of protecting itself. according to hazard a Caribbean usa and needed u . s . will INVITE us in to sparkling up some situation. not one of the 4 you listed could be on the record for various motives, which incorporates that it does no longer be an invasion that shall we win. we want the Rogue states and pariah states which comprise Iran, Syria, North Korea, Venezuela to stay centred on somewhat than the countries that extremely are a super gamble to the US, which comprise China and its exports to us, Saudi Arabia and different Islamic states that export their terrorism/Islam.

Answer 7

There is no good reason to start a war with anyone. It would certainly not be in the best interests of the nation to start a war simply to make life hard for democrats.

Answer 8

We should. That way Hillary or Obama will have no choice but to do the opposite and "clean up" and stop it. If we don't, Hillary or Obama will start a "politically correct" war where Marines missing limbs are called... "armored deficient combatants".

Answer 9

Iran has about 10 percent of the worlds oil.

Answer 10

Obviously we need the next war to be Red vs Blue...that would sort the Dems out REAL quick.

Answer 11

Why? Do you need a job? Yeah, the Dems are just sooo good at sorting out messes.