Chavs are annoying and usually make terrible parents whose kids end up being chavs too.
However controlling who can breed is too Hitler like for me. Anyone can change-even chavs.
2007-08-28 04:23:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
Anyone who can't support children and have proved so, should not be allowed to have any more children. These people are a drain on society. Child benefit should only be paid for the first two kiddies and then if anyone chooses to have more then should have to prove their income supports this and the government will have less to pay out. Otherwise, if Chavs and Dobbers continue to have children and claim benefits to support their lifestyle then the country will become overrun with scum. So I do agree that forced sterilisation should be in place to control breeding. If animals can be culled to keep populations down then why shouldn't people be sterilised for the same reason but both sets of parents male and female should undergo the process as nearly all of them are not married so then neither one can father or mother any more off-spring. I know some will say it's peoples choice to have kids but it should also be on peoples ability to keep them as well.
2007-08-31 00:12:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Soup Dragon 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
That would be going a bit too far in my opinion. I certainly would like to see some sort of restraint placed on unsocial people having children, but apart from perhaps a licensing system, just do not see how it could be achieved. I have no doubt that poor parenting is passed on to the children who in turn make poor parents and so on and so on. But why pick on chavs with criminal records? There are those who have the advantage of a good education etc. who still become criminals.
2007-08-28 06:18:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, you don't need a criminal record to be a bad parent, there are many so called 'pillars of the community' that are completely atrocious parents.
And going to this sort of measure is a bit reminiscent of a Nazi regime. Once you get rid of freedom of choice then the country would really be done for.
Why don't people put more effort into rehabilitating people like this. A lot of them have been brought up poorly and don't know any different.
EDIT: for all those that claim that people have children for benefits, are you having a laugh? There is no way you can bring children up properly on the benefits people get. A couple of my friends are single mothers (one cant work due to ill health and the other is at college) and they have to survive on buttons and go without a lot of essentials themselves so that their children can have things.
2007-08-28 19:38:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lady Claire - Hates Bigotry 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Chavs are a product of culture. Children are born innocent.
Suggest reader attack problem at seed rather than bloom.
Ban the UK that nurtures Chavs. Suggest another viewing
of the film, 'Clockwork Orange', old thing.
2007-08-28 19:06:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If any doubt about the answer to this question then i suggest everyone watch Trisha or Jeremy Kyle - teenage chavs (not working, of course) barely able to speak a single sentence without swearing, usually on drugs of some sort and if female then heavily pregnant by some bloke who's name she's not sure of - where did it all go wrong?
2007-08-28 09:30:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by colgirl 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
LOL! People do need to realise that there is more to a baby than benefits. People do not seem to have the same strict upbringing as they used to and have no respect for other poepl these days. The youth is getting out of control, part of it the parents fault, but also the fault of these kid glove rules. There is no deterrent to stop a 12 year old causing havoc, you can' touch them, arrest them, and if you tell the parents they give you more abuse!!
My answer would probably be yes lol!!
2007-08-28 02:40:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by SJC 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
absolutely everyone who won't be in a position to help babies and have proved so, should not be allowed to have from now on babies. those extremely everyone seems to be a drain on society. new child income could desire to purely be paid for the 1st 2 kiddies and then if absolutely everyone chooses to have extra then could desire to could desire to instruct their income helps this and the government could have much less to pay out. otherwise, if Chavs and Dobbers proceed to have babies and declare reward to help their life type then the rustic will develop into overrun with scum. So I do agree that forced sterilisation could desire to be in place to administration breeding. If animals could be culled to maintain populations down then why shouldn't human beings be sterilised for the comparable reason yet the two gadgets of mothers and dads lady and male could desire to submit to the technique as virtually all of them at the instant are not married so then neither you are able to nevertheless parent from now on off-spring. i be responsive to a pair will say that is peoples option to have babies whether it additionally must be on peoples potential to maintain them besides.
2016-10-03 08:45:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by pihl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, we should set a trap!!
We could set up vast 'studios' across the country, with the pretence that the Jeremy Kyle show is being filmed in their, and entrance is free. When all the chavs have ambled out of their pits and down to the studios, we can lock em in and gas em!
2007-08-30 04:34:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know how i feel about this question. In today's society anyone who is working class or a single parent etc is considered a chav to some people. If you mean the true chav, big gob, unemployed, scroungers who are infecting our country then yes i agree they shouldn't be allowed to breed.
2007-08-29 08:52:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
YES!!!!!!!
Of course they should be prevented from having children, but if anybody were ever to seriously suggest that they'd be shot!
As a distinct group within UK society, they are largely unable to support themselves - instead relying on Income Support and various other Government handouts.
Any group that is unable to support itself should not be able to exist - it couldn't happen in nature, so why should it happen with people?
It's a false situation created by the Welfare State and we're all paying the price in terms of the large amounts that it takes to support these people and also in terms of the crime that they commit inc. antisocial behaviour which costs every one of us - how many people can say they've NEVER had their car vandalised......that costs money to put right.
If you don't work.....you don't eat as far as I'm concerned - the only exceptions being people who're sick and disabled and those who've fallen on hard times and require temporary help until they get themselves together again. This does NOT include the likes of Mr Lee Charver who just wants to spend his life dossin' around, drinking, breedin' and smashing his neighbours' cars up each evening......just for light entertainment.
AND before people shoot me, bear in mind that I've grown up around people like this, went to school with them and lived near them........AND suffered under them! I know what I'm talking about!
2007-08-28 03:40:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋