Habitual means it is a habit...you keep doing it
2007-08-28 02:08:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2016-06-12 01:13:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Latasha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you mean habitual offender. That means that you have committed a similar offense before. Habitual means making a habit of something. Courts often consider repeat offenses when sentencing new crimes. Many states have a " 3 strikes rule" that gives additional jail time when convicted of a repeat offense.
2007-08-28 02:14:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by ruby 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Habitual offender status. Usually means 3 or more convictions. It can be used to enhance your sentence. It also means that you have to do at least 85% of your time in most states before you are elligible for parole. It is very bad. It is even worse to be a violent habitual offender, or the big *****.
2007-08-28 04:08:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by the hump 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
An habitual offender is someone who has been convicted multiple times, not necessarily of the same crime. Most states have additional mandatory penalties (i.e., more jail time) for people who are classified "habitual offenders."
2007-08-28 02:09:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by dr_usual 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hrm ... do you mean a "habitual offender"? A "habitual offender" is someone who consistently commits offenses of an unethical or illegal nature. Habitual offenders are sometimes referred to as "career criminials", as that is all they are ever expected to be (they spend more time in jail than they do outside of jail).
2007-08-28 02:13:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by jvermaes 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It' habitual offender. Root word being Habit, which means a person has made a habit of commiting the same crime over and over. Yes, the courts tend to frown on that kind of behavior as it indicates that you are not rehabilitating and changing your behavior patterns, thus, you will get harsher and harsher sentences.
2007-08-28 02:24:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by booman17 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Someone who is labeled an Habitual offender has been convicted of multiple crimes and if he is convicted again, then the sentence passed down can be higher than the maximum sentence that a first-timer would get for the same crime.
2007-08-28 02:10:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gary D 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is called habitual offender. That means they have offended over and over again (making a habit of it - hence the word HABITual) - just means they've been i trouble several times before
2007-08-28 02:09:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The phrase is habitual offender. It is what someone is called that commits the same crime over and over again. For example someone who is constantly in trouble for drunk driving is a habitual offender.
2007-08-28 02:10:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Oracle of Delphi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a Habitual Offender - a person who frequently has been convicted of criminal behaviour and is presumed to be a danger to society. In an attempt to protect society from such criminals, penal systems throughout the world provide for lengthier terms of imprisonment for them than for first-time offenders. In the 1990s habitual-offender laws became harsher, and in extreme cases some offenders were detained permanently.
The idea of habitual-offender legislation reflects the basic assumption of positivist criminology that crime is analogous to disease and should be treated by comparably flexible measures. According to this view, a person with persistent tendencies to commit crimes should be quarantined from society as would someone with a seriously infectious disease. During the first half of the 20th century, advocates of habitual-offender legislation appealed to then-popular biological theories of crime to argue that if a person committed several major crimes, it was reasonable to assume that he was criminal by nature and needed to be imprisoned indefinitely. In the 1950s, however, the work of criminologist Marvin Wolfgang and others indicated that only a relatively small number of criminals become serious multiple offenders and that these criminals commit the great majority of violent crimes and serious offenses against property. Some studies suggest that this dangerous hard core constitutes only about 2 percent of all offenders.
In theory, identifying and incapacitating such offenders early in their criminal careers should prevent a large number of serious crimes. In practice, however, it is difficult to devise laws that identify not just habitual offenders but all those who are likely to commit serious crimes. For example, many laws stipulate that once an individual has been convicted of three felonies, he should qualify for habitual-offender status and receive a lengthy prison term. But in various U.S. states, many nonviolent and less-serious offenses—such as committing fraud, bouncing checks, and even committing bigamy—are considered felonious crimes. The incarceration of those who commit such offenses is, at a minimum, controversial. Another point of controversy is that the availability of habitual-offender laws may unfairly enhance the powers of prosecutors, who can entice petty offenders to plead guilty by threatening to charge them with felonies that would earn them habitual status.
In the 1990s several habitual-offender laws were passed in the United States and elsewhere in the belief that they would help to reduce violent crime. In 1994 California enacted a so-called “three strikes and you're out” statute, which imposed a life sentence for a third serious felony conviction. These laws, which remain controversial, contributed to a dramatic increase in the prison population. Despite such criticisms, nearly half of American states and the federal government had some form of three-strikes legislation by the end of the 1990s.
2007-08-28 02:10:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by tushanna_m 4
·
0⤊
0⤋