cause if not,,why vote for them?as they would be liers
2007-08-28 00:13:00 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
lora k,,,thats what its starting to look like,I also question Hillary universal heathcare plan.chow
2007-08-28 00:24:32 · update #1
I don't see either of them pulling our troops out. At this point, we have too much interest at stake financially. Like it or not, they are no different than any other politicians. They'll say what they have to in order to become elected.
We have more civilians working in Iraq than we do soldiers. Big business is making substantial profits, and big business will end up winning out. Our Embassy that is under construction is larger than the Vatican. I foresee military bases that will be permanent structures.
As far as Hillary and health care goes, I'm with you. She's collecting too many donations to turn around and stab them.
2007-08-28 00:40:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They’ll withdraw most of the troops and leave a small number to guard certain American interests including the incredibly expensive embassy that the Bush administration has already spent hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ money on.
2007-08-28 07:30:54 · answer #2 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obama won't, he's already said that he's considering concentrating on areas in the Middle East militarily. At least he gives the impression of understanding that something has to be done over there to prevent further troubles over here. (This is not an endorsement, just an observation).
2007-08-28 07:23:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they will continue to state that the battlefield for the war on terror should be in Iraq -the troops wont go anywhere - I do not deny al qaeda is there -but I think by staying there it is probable that shites sunnis - will go against us giving a larger base to terrorist organizations .it seems to me like we are planting seeds to grow future terrorists -the war on terror should not be so hi-profile- it should all be special military ops and intelligence gathering -we should be using our experience on the war on drugs to eliminate these people -the similarities are astounding-think of this analogy china attacks the US -you as a person have never broken a law in your life -they take out the govt -they put in place a govt -people who were in charge start rebelling (I would hope)-your family is accidentally killed during the war -you would want revenge yes or no?would you take up arms for the first time in your life -yes or no?
2007-08-28 07:33:03 · answer #4 · answered by rooster 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, They are paid for by Haliburton. They already lied to us, and are now funding the war after winning control on an anti war stance... Bush must be laughing all the way to the bank.
Example- ( Child )Hey Mom I'm going to buy some weed after school but I dont have any money .. ( Mom ) Oh hunny I'm sorry let me write you a check.
2007-08-28 07:17:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama won't because after threatening to send troops into the worlds most dangerous and nuclear armed muslim nation (Pakistan) he now stands as much chance of getting elected as Paris Hilton.
Hillary won't because once she is in office she will realise that world politics is more complex and difficult than making glib statements.
You watch.......she will start the process then something "will happen" which means that the policy has to be revised....
2007-08-28 07:21:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it does not matter who wins the elaction,.....the troops are going nowhere,.....if the troops were to be removed, we
(the U.S.A.), would have to go back to iraq at some point in our life times, to finish what was started, maybe your grandchildren could fight the war,.....the Dems know this as well as the Cons,....as you see Hillary is starting to say the surge is working,.....she wants to play both sides of this,.....as for Hillarys health care plan,.....if you think health care is expensive now,.....wait till it is free,......
2007-08-28 07:35:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You misspelled "liars." Both are saying whatever they think is necessary to get votes and campaign contributions. Both would have to honor any treaties, contracts, agreements entered into between the US and Iraq. They would not have the luxury of doing whatever they want.
2007-08-28 07:22:18 · answer #8 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NOOO... I'm sorry to say it but they won't
The only ones who will are Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich... anyone else is a wasted vote based on empty promises
2007-08-28 09:42:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vote for whomever you wish.They prey on ignorant fools that think they are also so ignorant as to withdraw the troops.They aren't,only the foolish youth who believe it are.There will be troops in the middle east when your grand children are grown.Get used to it.No one is bringing them home
2007-08-28 08:09:51 · answer #10 · answered by nobodinoze 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋