She is PANTS isn't she?
Think about John Reid and then consider this woman?
GET HER OUT GORDON. She hasn't a bloody clue. Weak as p*ss.
2007-08-27 23:13:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Voice of Reason.
Her extremely weak response to the Rhys Jones murder & her rabbit in the headlights expression that went with it.
Feel free to edit your answer.
2007-08-28 09:39:12 · update #1
I think she should be left in place..... the longer she shows up this bloody labour lot for what they really are (bloody useless), the better chance we (hopefully) have of getting rid of the buggers at the next election.
2007-08-28 09:42:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its the problem this country's suffered from for 10 years now. Government and ministers with no beliefs just a lust for power, and then are found to be wanting. How can you make policy if you don't have any convictions about anything. All that's happened in the last 10 years is every mad scheme thought up by the civil service as being implemented. Increasing the size of the civil service at the expense of the tax payer.
2007-08-28 23:45:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think we accept that she is useless, but what do you expect. Ministers are not qualified in any way. One day he's at the Home Office, the next he's in charge of Education and three months later, Defence. It's about time we started using experts. Let the politicians debate things, but get professionals to run the country.
After all, if you needed a brain surgeon, you wouldn't hold an election to pick the person to operate on you, would you?
2007-08-28 16:56:35 · answer #3 · answered by Do not trust low score answerers 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clueless jacqui will be easily controlled by Brown until he dumps her because of New Labours's failing, traitorous policies. She will get the blame and Brown will hope that the public will be satisfied. In the meantime, expect plenty more murders up and down the counrty and a further decline in school standards and general discipline.
Guy U makes a valid point, that demonstrates the utter incompetence of New Labour scum.
2007-08-28 15:53:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
John Reid - "i'll do the job but only for 6 months then i cant be blamed for anything!"
J. Smith has no clue but when was the last time a government minister had any experience of their portfolio.
When was a soldier in charge of defence?
A farmer on charge of agriculture?
A doctor in charge of the NHS?
A teacher in charge of education?
Government is the servant of the country - not its master.
2007-08-28 06:20:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree, I think only people who have experienced many things can do this job. It would be like me going to give a talk on the mechanics of a car? not a clue?
2007-08-28 09:27:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She is not capable of doing the job. She is being rewarded for kissing gordons ****
2007-08-28 10:19:30 · answer #7 · answered by Bob N 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Can you give examples to justify your assertion?
Otherwise you will just get predictable "I agree" type answers from the usual Tory suspects.
2007-08-28 13:43:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
She is not trying to be Home Secretary.
She is Home Secretary.
I doubt you could do any better.
2007-08-28 06:19:23 · answer #9 · answered by nontarzaniccaulkhead 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋