English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1993 was the first attempt to attack the trade centers, 8 years later they attacked again. To me it doesn’t seem like anyone has the right to blame the president unless they know 100% that he knew it was going to happen.

2007-08-27 20:16:40 · 13 answers · asked by paul b 2 in Politics & Government Government

13 answers

The president is NOT responsible for the attacks. But the government did have knowledge that there was going to be some kind of attack on the USA with airplanes into USA buildings.. I think that they should of tightened secruity around that time.

2007-08-27 20:25:28 · answer #1 · answered by Sadie C 4 · 4 0

There is plenty of blame to go around, Starting with the overly religous highjakers. The fact that Bush was handed a C.I.A. report that warned him of there plans to "crash a jumbo jet into a tall building - IN NEW YORK ..and chose to do NOTHING and go on vacation makes me wanna know why!? Think about this, no 9-11,,no war in Iraq.. No 9-11,,no-/ no bid contracts for Haliburton..No 9-11 ,, No exicuting the only poeple who could expose the billons$ that Chaeni pocketed from the oil for food progam. My dad told me long ago,"FOLLOW THE $$$ it will always lead you to who & why!

2007-08-28 04:08:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well I blame the president, and I also don't think he is telling the truth, and with Gonzales gone, maybe some of the skeletons will start coming out of closets.

Please show me that 100 ton, 1/2 football field long, almost a football field wide Boeing 757-200 that hit the Pentagon! We have been asking the FBI to produse 1 lousy picture of it and they can't. They said it "vaporized"! That's interesting as Titanium usually doesn't vaporize,,,,and they recovered the bodies. How did that happen if it vaporized? Surely if Titanium vaporized the bodies would have also, or did they all have parachutes?

They have the flight data recorder, and that doesn't match either!

This is what PILOTS SAY!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580

The Pentagon was hit by a cruise missle!

2007-08-28 03:47:04 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 3

I place none of the blame on Bush and only part of the blame on the airlines. I mean, come on. No one should be able to carry box cutters and other sharp tools in their carry on luggage. Had they confiscated them - many, many people would still be alive today.

2007-08-28 03:36:36 · answer #4 · answered by SW1 6 · 1 0

I don't think it was either Bush's' fault or the airlines! What were the airlines supposed to do, know in advance that terrorists were going to do that, and stop them? If they could do that, there would be no more air disasters, because "the airlines" would be psychic! No, the fault lies squarely at the door of Bin Laden. That's my opinion.

2007-08-28 03:28:56 · answer #5 · answered by private_treasure1226 2 · 4 1

How about it was the Terrorists fault I mean they did do it and all. Yeah the government knew but they never knew when or how it would be done. Its like they tell you its gonna rain today and the you get caught in the rain so is that your fault?

2007-08-28 03:25:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

I blame the fact that we do not have control of immigrants. We need our borders closed and all illegals removed from the country and then we could track legal visitors much easier.

2007-08-28 09:36:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Neither. The government officials who should have taken threats more seriously, and the terrorists are to blame

2007-08-28 04:01:03 · answer #8 · answered by KittyFly 4 · 2 0

Muslims are to blame plain and simple! The ones here should be thankful we cherish human life!

2007-08-28 03:31:16 · answer #9 · answered by brenda r 3 · 3 0

Try blaming sloth, laziness, greed and selfishness. And of course, the terrorists themselves.

2007-08-28 07:40:13 · answer #10 · answered by Lisbeth 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers