English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-27 16:23:54 · 34 answers · asked by JANNINE C 1 in Politics & Government Government

34 answers

he had more relatives counting the votes in Florida than the other party

2007-08-27 16:29:52 · answer #1 · answered by Paul W 3 · 4 8

you certainly did %. undesirable human beings to alter into the prez!!! Are you a conservative? attempt extra nurturing and much less warmongering genocidal imbeciles, somebody who has very own integrity and ethics. you will desire to %. some truly proficient psychological and humanitarian. Ghandi would have made an superb prez. i'd think of Noam Chomsky or Micheal Parenti, who're nevertheless alive. Scientist like Einstein would be too heartless, considering the fact that he grew to become into the single, as all of them do now, worked for the protection branch. Ron Paul would have made a desperate progression in US presidents as or these days, yet, or path, human beings of that high quality under no circumstances get picked because of the fact of our degraded, Jewish-owned company media. We basically get a gaggle of criminals up for prez and not worth bothering with.

2016-12-16 06:40:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't have any conspiracy theories, but I've noticed Americans vote mostly for the most, "primal" candidate of the two parties. If you really think about it, most of the winners of presidential elections were the ones who came across as being the most rugged and whatnot. Al Gore was too stuffy, and John Kerry came across as an elitist. George Bush fit the bill better than the other candidates.

Americans want the bureaucratic, political version of John Wayne. A politician at mind, but a cowboy at heart: someone who isn't afraid of standing up for what we believe in, but doesn't go shooting his gun without reason. Cautious but proud, tough but kind. George Bush still fits the bill for a some of this, but his arrogance and ignorance concerning Iraq ruined it all for him.

2007-08-27 16:48:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I don't get why don't people respect our president he did his best could you have done any better ugh i am sick of people being rude insensitive and just plain stupid . People watch the news and say oh i hate George Bush just because he flubbed up in a speech or too!

2007-08-30 05:26:43 · answer #4 · answered by justme 3 · 1 0

Because his father, George H.W. Bush, was humiliated, ridiculed, and criticized for 'not finishing the job' in Iraq during Desert Storm and ousting Saddam Hussein at that time. The Bush family had a personal vendetta against Hussein ever since, and George, Jr. was 'selected' as President so he could 'settle the score'.
By bringing Dick Cheney in as Vice-President, the Bush family put someone in the White House that could keep George, Jr. from screwing up the entire mission (after all, the family's wealth, influence and power has always bailed George, Jr. out of every other mess he's gotten himself into). Plus, Cheney wanted all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands, so it made perfect sense to use his Halliburton connections to help start a 'war' for more logical reasons than the Bush family's personal grudge. -RKO- 08/27/07

2007-08-27 17:17:44 · answer #5 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1 5

A combination of Ralph Nader and the Florida recount.

2007-08-31 02:37:02 · answer #6 · answered by Boris 2 · 0 0

The perfect order of things--Providence disguised as Fate.

2007-08-28 06:51:26 · answer #7 · answered by Dear Carlos 7 · 0 0

Because he can listen to Micheal Jackson talking to his television

2007-08-28 08:29:18 · answer #8 · answered by SOF+1 2 · 0 0

To continue the evil dynasty.

2007-08-28 08:47:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

won the most electoral votes...and popular in the last election...lost popular vote to Gore...but won electoral....electoral votes count...not popular votes....each state tallies popular votes...the winner...allows all the electors to cast their votes at the states's capital 41 days after the election. The amount of electors granted equal the state's US Representatives plus the 2 Senators....so...ifd more votes for Bush came in Ohio...all the Bush electors would cast their votes...and all the Democrats would not vote at all.

2007-08-27 16:34:31 · answer #10 · answered by explorer4x4guy 2 · 3 4

Back in 2000 he was appointed president by the supreme court and re-elected in 2004 by a fading generation that was weakened by fear.

2007-08-27 16:41:44 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers