This guy was a crony and was a picture in the dictionary beside the word. I think he brought shame to such a highly respected position. The pressure he got from Democrats and Republicans alike was well deserved. Anyone who thought this guy did a good job needs their head checked.
2007-08-27 15:56:08 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Exactly. He's a disgrace to US.
It's staggering, how much misery and deception bush's brought on this country!
It is also amazing, how many high end positions are available in this Adm.!!!
2007-08-27 16:41:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
well, bush said he did a good job!!!
and he certainly needs his head checked!!
but i still think there's some sneaky stuff goin down!!!
what kinda buttkisser is the next one gonna be!!!
i mean gonzalas was blatant, without a clue to what was goin down!!!
he thought daddy bush would carry him to the top, the land of ozz!!!
the nwo!!!
it was investigated by lawyers and reporters that these were all bushes picks , but when bush started gaining more power and taking away more of our freedom and ridin high on he patriotic war wave, bush was gonna lock the doors tight behind him!!!
only those 100%ers were gonna be allowed in his club!!!
so he had the ones who had a consience and morals and respect for the law still in them fired!!!
2007-08-27 23:25:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends...who will replace him...someone worse...better...bureaucracy's like all the Cabinet departments have a lot of power to sway things...especially those folks working well under the higher ranks like appointees of Presidents..ie A.G.....you have to keep an eye on those lower ranking employees....A.G.s can also be used as scapegoats...for presidential scherades.
2007-08-27 23:47:35 · answer #3 · answered by explorer4x4guy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He supported the Patriot Act and is a shame to any position in government. Anyone that has supported this act should be kicked out or they should know their mistakes and resign.
2007-08-27 23:09:32 · answer #4 · answered by cheezbawl2003 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it is good for the country not to have a stupid, immoral person in that position. AG brought shame on the position of AG.
GWB+AG=BS4US
2007-08-27 23:02:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
It depends on who replaces him. At least Gonzales was "the devil we knew," and fairly incompetent. What if we get someone who has no conscience but is brilliant in his place? That wouldn't be good for the country at all.
2007-08-27 23:09:03 · answer #6 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not as good as Bush and Cheney resigning, but pretty damn good.
2007-08-27 23:01:46 · answer #7 · answered by Jason 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
true that.
and dont it seem that all the news involving republicans is just sickning?
well, if the shoe fits.....tap,tap,tap
like my business card......
something getting flushed..
2007-08-27 23:35:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, the democrats who claim to be the party of minorities really mean that if you are of a usually protected minority class, ie hispanic, you must next pass the test of being a liberal as well. if not, you are not a minority and therefore mus go. ie clarence thomas, condi rice, colan powell, and ofcourse, AG. hypocrisy runs rampant sponsored by the DNC agenda and the actual actions of a liberal and scorful congress. to answer your q, no. remember clinton fired ALL of the US attorneys when his puppet became AG, but no one mentions that. pure politics.
2007-08-27 23:04:03 · answer #9 · answered by 27ysq 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
It was so political..He did nothing wrong..The people he fired were political appointees there at the whim of the president, and he could have fired everyone of them if he wanted to, legally, and replaced them with his own people.. Bill Clinton did.
the only mistake they made was not answering all the attacks with a "So what?!?"
2007-08-27 23:05:12 · answer #10 · answered by bro_tj1 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋