why didnt the HISTORY CHANNEL tell you about the explosives used in three buildings on 9/11 ???

Question

proof of explosives ???? you be the judge

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7094370627958457222&q=explosives+bombs+9%2F11&total=135&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw


a much deeper look at this shows us that in fact........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU

SEAHAWK, the facts are the facts, why do you defend a corrupt government?? don you remember the lies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE2SdF1fN4s

Answer 1

YouTube videos are bunk, and Ron Paul can't run a corner drug store, much less the Executive Branch.

How successful has he been in getting his proposals through Congress, where they belong?

Not very? yep...and you think he'll do better in the White House, where he has to run the Executive Branch?

Answer 2

I agree with Dick W. He's got first hand experience and even Rosie went on air explaining how only through explosives would that building freefall. Within Re-open 911 they showed close ups of the towers as they fell and suggested that the way the beams were outwardly jutted could only be from explosives. Let's face it there were plenty reasons for these buildings to come down. I heard that one objective was to clean up the environmental mess underneath the buildings. As well the CIA trained Al-Queda so why not have them involved in a strike against the U.S.A. If all went well then we could have our war for oil and strategic placement of missile defense systems. If you don't watch Traveller, you should, it's very interesting how they cover everything from Iran/Contra to corruption at the level of Homeland Security. I believe its a direct result of all the talk from conspiracy theorists.

Answer 3

After all the crap most of you sponge heads have soaked up, I wouldn't touch this question with a ten foot pole!
Why do people think 'what if' and then try to drag it over on the side of reality?

Answer 4

Because explosives weren't used to take down the twin towers on 9/11. Get a life. Besides, the links you posted are not credible sources. Any idiot can make a video to suit their own conspiracy theories. What "facts?" What "lies?" How is our government "corrupt?"

Answer 5

the History Channel couldn't tell us about the explosives because they didn't want to get hunted down by the government. The government knew about 9/11 and they don't want us to know everything that really happened on that day. They want us to believe only the things they tell us and nothing else. They hide sooooooo much stuff from us.

Answer 6

I ALSO WATCHED that showing on the History Channel and I will repeat what I have previously posted:

----
"I also watched that show just now on the history channel, which was said to be unbiased presenting both sides but all they did is make the "conspiracy" people (the people that are asking questions and raising points that go against the "official story") look EVIL and WRONG and that they DON'T RESPECT THE LOSS OF LIVES ON THAT DAY. WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS!

My 1st link below is to the article which explains how the history channel is back-pedaling from it's description (but not changing the bias).

They left out MANY of good points that are in Loose Change as well as Zeitgeist. They also presented everything with a CONSPIRACY Response: followed by EXPERT'S Response..... With the footage they used basically it made it seem like: Here's what the WRONG people say, Here's what the RIGHT people say....

What they should've done, is established an unbiased Side A proposal then a Side B proposal.

They didn't say anything about the sub-level explosions that went on in the basements of the trade center towers. They try to explain that FALLING DEBRI from the trade center towers FLEW across the way and hit trade center 7 starting fires! They also claimed that Silverstein (the owner of the trade center buildings) said that he decided to "pull it" and by that meaning pull out the people and firefighters (who says pull it? maybe evacuate? get everyone out?.... demolitionists say pull it is a well used phrase for initiating a demolition).

(3rd link below is the Loose Change video which raises many questions behind 9/11)

They didn't reveal ANYTHING about the smell of Thermite (used in explosives) at ground zero, NOR did they say anything about the perfect straight cuts in the steal beams of the building (which demolitionists explain is exactly how you take down a building, by cutting it diagonally). My 2nd link below shows a picture of exactly what I'm talking about.

AND THEY DIDN'T SAY A SINGLE THING ABOUT THE VIDEOS TAKEN BY CAMERAS AT THE GAS-STATION / HOTEL ACROSS THE HIGHWAY LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SIDE THAT WAS HIT BY THE PENTAGON: WHICH WERE TAKEN AWAY BY GOVERNMENT SECRET SERVICE AGENTS! (which display much more than 1 frame per second which was what the government did release)

The history channel's show 9/11 conspiracy theories was originally debunking 9/11 myths.

They also try to associate Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theorists" with people that don't care about the lives lost on that day. They bring up some lady saying that says "Whenever people bring up these conspiracies... it's like a knife being stabbed into my heart because they have no concern for the people that lost someone that day, or those that died" WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS. They do believe those people died, they do mourn their deaths, BUT they do not believe that it happened the way that we are being told!

Bottom line, they keep associating Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theory" believers with not caring about the people that died, or the people that lost someone....

Basically, they do reveal a lot of information but in the end, they try to say that all of the evidence brought to the attention by Loose Change, Webster Tarpley, and many many other professors and demolitionists is wrong, which it isn't.

This is just the most recent and official version of government propaganda trying to say that the "official story"(original claim of how/why 9/11 happened) is correct.

Edit:

Also see 4th link about the molten steel / thermite!
----

If you ask me, it's another government-attempt to manipulate the media and get us to stop thinking about what really happened on 9/11.



EDIT: LAST LINK BELOW IS IMPORTANT





EDIT:

To SeahawkFan37: If you look at scientific/logical evidence, you will come to find that what the government wants us to believe comes off as more of a conspiracy theory than the idea of explosives being planted in the buildings.

Answer 7

Another Urban Legend.

Suggest you subscribe to snopes .com It's free.

Answer 8

yes i believe there were.... from what i saw and what people were saying.. there would be no way that the buildings would collapse like that if the building didn`t have bombs go off in the bottom.. it`s called an implosion...an yes our government is corrupt.... i wouldn`t put it past them to do something so they would say they have cause to go to war..we need a president

Answer 9

They didn't mention explosivesn because the history channel presentation was non-fiction. There is no evidence of explosives.

I watched these movies. I've seen them before. They're nonsense.

Answer 10

BLAH BLAH BLAH...VERY credible witnesses froma very confusing moment...I prefer to believe my own eyes of WATCHING 2 PLANES penetrate the towers.....WHAT A DOLT.