2007-08-27 10:44:38 · 6 answers · asked by meat2dairy 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Here is why:
We are all different people who all think differently. If there was ever world peace, that would mean having one ruler to rule the world. It would also mean taking away freedom of speech. Why does world peace require taking away freedom of speech? Say someone states an opinion. Another person might disagree. This causes conflict.
Taking away freedom of speech would cause the world to be uptight, hostile, and it'd be like communist hell!
So, there you have it. In simpler words, we can't have both freedom and world peace.
2007-08-27 11:33:47 · answer #1 · answered by Greek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no desire to get along with angry, aggressive and violent individuals. You are welcome to them.
I further dislike social graces that disguise dislike. If you don't like me, I'm fine with that. The door is that way. *points to the right of the room*
2007-08-27 19:02:07 · answer #2 · answered by guru 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Envy and greed, two hostile emotions.
2007-08-27 17:50:37 · answer #3 · answered by mac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those who act in haste bring about their own destruction....
2007-08-27 18:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to many different personalities. its impossible for everyone to get along
2007-08-27 17:52:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't want to be alone...
2007-08-27 20:50:20 · answer #6 · answered by A 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋