Was Gonzales "good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons"?

Question

Does GWB know anyone with a good name?

For example, Cheney, Haggard, Foley, Rumsfeld, Could go on?

Answer 1

I saw Bush's speech live. Made me SICK.

Any shade of giving Bush the benefit of any doubt was lost at this point after hearing THAT BS.

Answer 2

Sorry but they've all gotten what they deserved. In actuality they have gotten off lightly. As a Republican I am ashamed of what these people have done in the name of the party. They have been an embarressment to the entire country. They have to a man been corrupt and at the very least incompetent. This administration has had no positive acheivements whatsoever. It has been simply a get rich (or richer) scheme from the word go. Sadly the Democrats offer no better solution just more corporate inspired government. The only alternative to the status quo is Ron Paul. You may not agree with everything he says but at least he respects that difference and you will generally find that it is on issues which he will acknowledge as being none of his or the govt's business. If you want to turn the clock back to when our constitution meant something then there's your choice otherwise you are going to get more of the same garbage that we have been burdened with since 2000.

Answer 3

The one couple who could have cared less was the Clintons. Gonna have the name , might as well have the game.
Their armor is their gang thang. People do "favors" for free just to get on their "good" side, which must be their shoe sole side since all the other views show plastic, lying and phonyness.
Rumor has it that a family man in AR was accused of ravishing a Clinton cousin. He was sumarilily grabbed and operated upon with his being kept in a pickle jar by the sheriff for "evidence".
One of the guy's sons allegedly found daddy had suddenly become a "soprano" only it was a male one with a high voice!
Democrats can really pick 'em!
At least Alberto escaped with his intacthood. And need not wait for a 1/3rd pardon or none at all like the Border patrol agents who shot gluteus maxilly in self defense.

Answer 4

hi gramma, i'm not responsive to any political prisoners held by employing the U. S. throughout the time of the Bush administration. Are you so heavily perplexed as to think of that terrorists being in git-mo are political prisoners. whilst maximum of those human beings echo the Democrat occasion line they don't seem to be in actuality political prisoners.

Answer 5

No, but rather his and the administrations credibility was critically questioned, which GWB equates to "dragging through the mud", a pretty juvenile reaction.

Answer 6

If they come with one, they sure do not leave with one, being W thinks that all work for his good , and not for the good of the American people. Not only was Fredo not allowed to announce his resignation with a good bye bear hug like Rove as able to do on camera, W called him Judge Gonzales, could it be that W is starting to forget, or I can't recall, his former attorney general

Answer 7

Why do you people throw in Foley and Haggard? Bush had nothing to do with those guys. Foley was elected by his constituents and Haggard was a preacher.

You people are just being stupid parrots now.

Answer 8

No, Alberto jumped into the mud and had a nice swim in it until Congress told him to clean up before dinner was ready.

Answer 9

What Bush is talking about I really don't know. It's not like the Dem's had someone in mind to take A.G.'s spot. Plus, he only became a real target after the attorney firings. A.G. deserved what he got. But it's strange Bush didn't defend Rove this admittedly.

Answer 10

I don't know Haggard and what does Foley have to do with Bush. Anybody associated with Bush is almost certainly a fine person. They don't make them any finer than Cheney or Rumsfeld. Any Republican will have his name dragged through the mud. There is BLIND hatred from many democrats.

Answer 11

Kind of like John McCain's good name in the Presidential election of 2000. Hmmmm.....