Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rove, Gonzalez and others as ? It appears they bailed when things got a little tough (feeling the heat), could this be classified as "cut and run"?
2007-08-27 07:21:35 · 15 answers · asked by HP 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
My apologies to "who cares what you think" I forgot to peel and slice his banana.
2007-08-27 07:31:16 · update #1
LOL....great point. I guess it's okay to cut and run when you are destroying your own life, but when you are destroying the lives of others, you gotta keep at it.
2007-08-27 07:55:18 · answer #1 · answered by Rosebee 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
From my reading this morning, I'd say there's no scientific proof of any correlation between cell phone use and brain cancer. All studies reviewed by the organization you listed above are statistical studies. There is no medical evidence as there is for cigarette smoking or breathing asbestos fibers. While there has been an explosive increase in the numbers of cell phone users, there has not been an increase in the number of brain cancers. One medical reporter I heard this morning talked about how 25 years ago there were people terrified of microwave ovens. Now you can't hardly find a kitchen without one. EDIT: Forgot to mention I don't own a cell phone. My kids don't like that much but I figure they don't need to have 24/7 access to me.
2016-05-19 02:41:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and No...you see the Air at their level is fantastic until
the do-do hits the fan (which it has done a lot lately) and
believe it or not..Money Talks (Especially when the
possibility of not having to leave it comes into the equation)
Then there is this thing of So-Called honor,they want the
party to look good even though they are plagued with
problems (Denial does that when Pride is involved)
In the end when this is all over the Results will be Clear
That Bush was the head of it all ,and possibly the Worst
President this country (Will Hopefully) have or ever had
2007-08-27 07:32:51 · answer #3 · answered by Johnnie C 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
When the powers that be demand resignation (World Bank telling Wolfowitz to gtfo, Bush told Rumsfeld to gtfo, Congress telling Gonzalez to gtfo), then one generally leaves. With Rove, he realized he couldn't push anymore legislation or planning around, so decided to go work on his golf swing.
As far as Iraq is concerned, the people don't want us there, and neither does the government. But when we talk about leaving, they tell us not to. The only ones calling for us to leave are: Sunni insurgents and Shia militas.
2007-08-27 07:36:29 · answer #4 · answered by K 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They're like rats leaving a sinking ship-and I mean that literally-they are rats. Big, NYC sized, rats!
Also, they are leaving in droves because they don't want to get arrested and go to jail and to "protect" their overlords and masters: Prez Shrub and Dickless Darth Cheney.
If these guys testified (that's if they can "recall" anything-seems like everyone in the Bush admin. has early onset dementia) against their keepers.....ooooooh boy. Altho' w/the lack of gonads on the part of the feckless Dems, they wouldn't do anything to these guys anyway. Didn't Pelosi say "impeachment was off the table?" WHY?
Impeachment should be never ruled out. It's part of the Constitution, and as such, should be available as a tool to indict and possibly convict these Shrub-loving criminals!
2007-08-27 08:39:04 · answer #5 · answered by NAPOLI 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Libs/Dems keep trying to fight the "last war" -- running against Bush/Rove/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Gonzalez -- over and over, instead of focusing on '08.. they're just gonna end up blowing another presidential election. Bush team is out in 16 months, folks.
2007-08-27 07:36:46 · answer #6 · answered by nileslad 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Typical liberal tactic; criticize and complain, no matter the circumstances. The Dems in Congress went head hunting for Mr. Gonzalez. They succeeded.
Liberals should make up their minds; should Gonzalez go or stay? You cannot have it both ways.
2007-08-27 07:39:46 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
NO. it would be called a distraction. the focus has been on rove,rumsfekd and others so much that the dems have forgotten about the war.good job bush! i am glad they have not lost lost their focus. destroy bush at whatever cost.
2007-08-27 08:20:13 · answer #8 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but they have excuses for what they do. They are corrupt politicians and want to get out before they get caught and destroy the Republican party. Like they were not already.
2007-08-27 07:26:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They are leaving Bush holding the bag by himself. We need them all investigated. Scaredy cats that are bailing out.
2007-08-27 07:29:23 · answer #10 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋