English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I watched and interesting show about sex the other day. It seems that unlike most creatures the human female is capable of having sex during times that will not produce an child. Now why is it that humans evolved to be able to have sex so frequntly? The prevailing theory seems to be to keep male around. Especially since human children are so weak and require so much attention, unlike other animal who are much more indepentant. Afterall, manl animals learn not only to walk, but run momeent after birth.

Since humans are so dependant as babies the female requires the the male to stay around and the biological drive of the male inclines it to want to mate as frequently as possible, women are therefore able to have sex all the time.

Now the question is if women choose to not have sex, then aren't they in fact undermining there own relationship, because this will go conflict with the biological of the human animal?

Would you stay in a relationship with no sex?

2007-08-27 06:02:40 · 19 answers · asked by snack_daddy10 6 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

19 answers

LOL
I wish more people had seen that show :)
I for one (if there isn't a medical reason) do see women that refuse to have sex more then a few times a month as hurting their relationships.
And unless there was a medical reason why me and hubby weren't having sex (or we weren't working on fixing the problem) then no I would not stay nor would I ask him too.

And just as an FYI dolphines also have sex whenever and apparently the females enjoy it just as much as the males do.

2007-08-27 06:19:02 · answer #1 · answered by Spring 5 · 0 0

1

2016-12-20 05:50:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You asked two questions- is more sex needed for a longer lasting commitment? I think it depends on the couple. As long as they are BOTH happy with the frequency of the sex, then it's all good. The other question- would you stay in a relationship with no sex? The only way I would do that, is if the person had a religious value that prohibited sex outside of marriage. But then I'd want lots of it the second we got married!

As far as all that other stuff about women and men compared to animals. I believe God gave women the ability to have, and even enjoy sex outside of procreation, simply for enjoyment. Yes, He made it fun so we'd procreate, but He also made it fun so we could enjoy intimacy with each other in way nothing else provides. As for women undermining their relationship because they don't WANT to have sex, and that no other species does that, well... maybe in the animal kingdom, the "wife" doesn't get a headache because her "husband" didn't spend the whole weekend drinking with his buddies or making a mess he expects HER to clean up!

2007-08-27 06:14:17 · answer #3 · answered by Heather K 2 · 0 0

"Now the question is if women choose to not have sex, then aren't they in fact undermining there own relationship, because this will go conflict with the biological of the human animal?"

I don't know about the biology of the human animal, but it does make some sense, but the fact is that we are the one animal with the ability to use common sense and intellect to help control our basic animal insticnts, so your argument is losing it's credibility right there. No man or woman can use the excuse, it's my biology to "sleep around" "eat bnut butter at 2am" etc etc.

Would you stay in a relationship with no sex? I would if it were someone I loved who was waiting for marriage, but if we were already married, no sex would be a very big issue.

2007-08-27 06:11:27 · answer #4 · answered by reddevilbloodymary 6 · 1 0

I have been suffering from premature ejaculation for most of my life, but I found the most amazing invention to tackle this issue and since then I never looked back, and it is so simple. ( http://prematurejaculation.kyma.info ) There are quite a few options to tackle this issue. Go and see a Doctor, he will write you a prescription for Dapoxetine. But look at the possible side-effects, I especially like the last two ( I don't reccomend it) . The most commonly reported side effects when taking Dapoxetine tablets30mg include, headache, gastrointestinal upset (nausea, diarrhea, dry mouth, abdominal discomfort), dizziness, drowsiness, tremor, difficulty sleeping, increased blood pressure, erectile dysfunction, reduced libido. There are the self control methods which are not really easy to achieve and time consuming, but the worst is that most of them instruct you to think of other things while making love, I want to experience my partner in full and as sexy as possible and not concentrate on Mickey Mouse or how not to come and deep breathing and what have you. I want to think about my partner and look at her in all details and watch her as if possible several times in one game, that’s what I want. The best solution is surely this method ( http://prematurejaculation.kyma.info ) I reccomend to check this method, it s the best choice! Did you know that there are a lot of sensitive points on both the cut and uncut penis? The uncut penis has more, though. It has 17 to where the cut ones have only 11. If you have an uncut one, then you’re feeling every little caress and it feels way too good and within a matter of minutes, wham! You’re gone, dude. But the same goes for many of the cut dudes too. The plaster is thin, see-thru and discreet looking and you can put it on ahead of time if you know you’re going to get lucky that night. If you’re uncut, it easily fits under the foreskin, unnoticed. Facts Are 1- Several places on the foreskin are considerably more sensitive than any point on the circumcised penis. 2- The glans are not the most sensitive part of the penis, but rather, among the least sensitive. 3- The most sensitive part of a circumcised penis is the foreskin’s remnant and scar. If you are interested in this product, just Google this sentence including the quotes, it will get you to the right place and you will find a lot more information there. "What we have to offer will allow you to delay your orgasms, able to please your lady for a long long time." For me, if this is done as instructed, I can go for at least 30 minutes and I have noticed that after using it for a while I even go longer without it. The best choice is check the website posted above.

2014-09-29 08:11:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the key thing to point out here is humans aren't like animals we have logic, reasoning, the ability to contemplate life outside of this world. What you are saying does make sense that babies need protection when they are young and the male should stick around. I cant help but think of the common thing most married guys complain about is the lack of sex or desire since theyve been married. I would have to say no sex is not needed because a man knows that his child is an investment in his future and his bloodline so its important to protect that investment.

2007-08-27 06:09:33 · answer #6 · answered by Balrog 2 · 2 0

I'm a woman. I stayed in a marriage for 3 years with virtually no sex because I wanted to work things out for my daughter's sake. But eventually I realized how miserable I was, and was making her. So I left. I happen to be a highly sexual female, who would love to have it every day if I could. I think the reason we have evolved to have sex all the time and not just when ovulating (for the purpose of making babies) is that IT FEELS GOOD. LOL! :-)

2007-08-27 06:11:00 · answer #7 · answered by meagain 4 · 0 0

I say, that no matter what got us to being able to have more sex, we do. So, to the quesiton, Would you stay in a relationship with no sex?" I say this. If it were a medical issue and no fault of my husband's, I would feel more than obligated to stay. If he cares, there would be "other ways" for him to satisfy if he couldn't perform. However, if he was just "with holding", then it would be a really hard thing to stay. I think I'd stay until I "biologically" couldn't take it anymore, and if he wouldn't meet me on the same page, I'd have to consider getting out. A marriage without sex is like an adobe house without mud.

2007-08-27 06:28:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it really depends on the individuals.some can't or wont stay where theres no sex or lack of sex.it was the lack of sex in my marriage that i hated but it wasn't his fault.he was on several medications that caused him not to be able to get a hardon.in other cases,some just don't want it as often as they once did.my answer to this question is no i guess because it led to an affair when i didn't get it at home.

2007-08-27 06:14:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's more complicated then that when people are in a relationship and feelings are involved.

It's more than biology.

I've been married for 32 years and if something happened that sex wasn't possible I would stay....I love him...it's that simple.

2007-08-27 06:07:39 · answer #10 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers