because Bushler and pals used US troop strength in an unnecessary war in Iraq, and also because they don't use effective espionage. With some work with local people we might have found Bin laden and also got Saddam without the war and the violence afterwards.
2007-08-27 06:03:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by mr_fartson 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Bin Laden is the SAME place that all the WMD's in Iraq are.Nowhere. If Bush were to capture him, there is NO way that he can justify keeping up HIS war on "Terrorism". He'll be found within a week after Bush leaves office OR, a week before the election so that the Republican candidate can get the credit for capturing him and get elected on that. Make a note of this and when it happens you'll KNOW that I'm right.
Raji the Green Witch
2007-08-29 10:07:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Raji the Green Witch 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
John Eric Rudolph, Martin Bormann, and Adolf Hitler. These three men evaded capture or the certainty of death of years. Adolf Hitler killed himself in 1945. The Soviet army captured his body but did not reveal this information until 1961. For 16 years it was unknown to the world if Hitler escaped or not. In 1991, prior to the collapse of the Soviet Unioin, six trusted officers took a portion of Hitler's remains to six different areas and disposed of them with orders to never reveal the location to anyone.
John Eric Rudolph blew up a bomb at the Atlanta Olympics and an abortion clinic. He killed at least one person. He was number one on the FBI's most wanted list in the 90s. He evaded capture for nearly six years while hiding out in North Carolina.
Martin Bormann was the number two Nazi when Germany surrendered in 1945. He evaded capture despite being hunted by the intelligent services of the US, England, the USSR, and later by Mossad. He was never captured and many believe he died in Argentina of nature causes in the 60s or 70s. His son is a famous Hollywood director and his grandson is an actor.
Like Usama, these three men either evaded capture or died without the world knowing about it for years.
Pakistan is more rugged than North Carolina, Usama has a better organization than Rudolph had, Pakistan is a sovereign country as is Argentina. We can't force our way in, he has allies, and he may be dead which would make it difficult to track him down like Hitler's remains.
2007-08-27 13:17:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
We knew where Hitler was, and we couldn't get to him either. The areas where Bin Laden has been hiding out are mountainous and he has a vast network of people protecting him. It is not as easy as it sounds. We need to try and get him the same way we got Saddam, through an informant, but penetrating Bin Laden's network is very difficult. The people protecting him are extremely loyal.
2007-08-27 17:05:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dude 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Pakistan is bigger than Texas.
2. He's hiding amongst people who are loyal to him.
3. He's not staying in a Motel 6, so we can't use a map.
4. We have no idea where to look.
2007-08-27 12:53:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wocka wocka 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
You can't see a dead man. Nobody has seen him since he was reportedly killed in Afghanistan. It benefits the terrorists for you and everyone else to believe he's alive, but unless he makes a live TV broadcast we should just forget this person.
2007-08-27 14:58:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by soñador 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they can't afford to catch him What would they do with him. If he's in prison hostages will be taken on a regular basis to try to get him out - if he is whacked - they have another martyr. So I think missing is just fine for the powers that be right now
2007-08-27 13:18:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Van der Elst 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
US government "made" Bin laden and his supporters , to fight USSR in Afghanstan ..
After they finished their tasks there , a new game started to interfere in the world particularly Arab & Muslim countries under the title of "Fighting Terrorism!!"..
G, Bush jr, enjoyed the game with Bin laden .. because if Bin laden and his supporters are caught , then there will be reasonable cause to interfere!!!??
2007-08-27 13:21:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by mustafa63gar 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Quite simply because He's not the one Resopnsible for
9/11. If He Truly was, He would've been caught long ago
already. People just Believe everything that's fed to them via the News and Media! Face It! And also, there's a possibility
that He's not even Alive!
2007-08-27 13:03:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Because it's almost impossible to find a 6'7" man who's dragging a dialysis machine behind him. Seriously, I think that he's probably either deathly ill and in deep hiding or that he's dead.
2007-08-27 12:59:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋