go back in time and pick a back in the second instead of a QB
wait....that wasn't an option, sorry
ask this in the Fantasy Sports Section
wait.......not an option again....sorry
Take a RB
-----and to the moron internet pervs, that picture is obviously not the person asking the question
and even if it was, you complimenting them on it won't get you any tail....
2007-08-27 06:04:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by retired 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Always take the RB--WR is a deep position, and there are plenty of quality players to be had in the later rounds. Benson will get the majority of the carries in Chicago, as will Jones in NY. The later you wait to draft an RB, the greater the chance will be that particular back plays in a split-back system, which is a killer for fantasy. Of your first 3-4 picks, 2 should always be RBs, without question.
2007-08-27 13:21:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by dlatona7 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Take the RB. Benson has issues but you don't want your RB2 to be some part- timer on a bad team! The good WRs will be there later on.
2007-08-27 13:36:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kyrix 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Take fitz, guys like Mike Bell etc will be availablel later for your second backs, and could score lots of points.
2007-08-27 13:24:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by rome 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Take a back. An average back will get you more points in most leagues than a great receiver.
And, you are smokin' hot!
2007-08-27 12:49:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
get fitz. Plenty of other backs out there.
2007-08-27 13:04:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by junglekat75 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
benson
2007-08-27 13:12:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Can i pet your peeve?
2007-08-27 12:58:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
well, I need someone to teach me about football, I don't understand the game, but I do watch it, really!
2007-08-27 12:47:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Flowers 7
·
1⤊
5⤋