English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

41 answers

I find him a supreme disappointment. He lacks the necessary abilities and features to be a president.

leadership is more than pointing a way; you have to lead. He chooses to do nothing

2007-08-27 03:17:29 · answer #1 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 7 11

Sadly, the majority of the people you will hear from this morning are not working -- probably on some sort of government assisatance program, most likely are liberal minded and not well educated. These are the people who are deeply disturbed and have yet to learn that you should NEVER speak ill of the President. Doing so falls under the definitions of treason, sedition and generally shows a serious lack of tact, grace and humility.
As for me, I own a small business and enjoy taking a moment out of my morning each day to review the news of the world and answer questions here. My business has doubled in business each year for the last three years. I am quite content. I'm paying a huge amount out in taxes, but if the OTHER major political party were in charge, I'd be taxed right out of business. I pay attention to the news and politics, I am relatively well educated and possess a keen ability to think clearly. I make good decisions about my life and have done well for bith myself and those I employ. Bush does a fair job as President.

2007-08-27 03:27:44 · answer #2 · answered by Doc 7 · 1 3

My personal opinion of George W. Bush is good and bad, he has done good for corporate America, allowing huge profits to oil tycoons and other big money corporations, helping the rich get richer and more powerful, but the down side is he has done nothing to help the middle class, more and more small businesses are closing because of the big money corporations and foreign trade, especially with China has gotten out of hand, but that again helps big money corporations rake in the huge profits, while the "little man" has to struggle to make ends meet. If he was such a wonderful President and leader of the people of this great nation, he would have rebuilt New Orleans with our tax dollars instead of sending more troops to Iraq to fight a war we will never win. He would rather spend trillions of our dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan over rebuilding one of his own cities demolished by an act of God. How many people from the Katrina disaster are still without homes, but Iraqi people are given jobs, and paid by our government to do those jobs, but yet our people here at home go without food and shelter. He has done nothing for the average person here in the US, but cause heartache and loss ( the loss of loved ones serving in the war zones and also the loss of our jobs and homes due to foreign trade). I suppose he's a nice enough person, as a person, but as our leader....if your an average person, living an average life, he's useless but he's been wonderful to the wealthy and I'm sure all wealthy people love him, but I'm average and he's done nothing to make my life easier. I am so thankful he cannot be our President again.

2007-08-27 03:41:08 · answer #3 · answered by robotchic 2 · 3 2

The Bush,es and the Clinton's are the rulers of the new world order, two families run the USA and want the world.

2007-08-31 03:00:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He's a manipulative liar, who can't deliver a speech to save his life. He's done nothing but caused a lot of trouble for this country and now he's leaving his burden on the next President so this will make him look bad. He's not for the people, he's in it for the money. War makes money and that's why he refuses to send our troops home.

I don't believe nothing this man says, I can barely watch him on tv stumbling on his words. Do we need somebody like this running the damn country. But people voted for him, and I don't see why. Even the republicans are second guessing him.

He needs to be euthanized once and for all

2007-08-27 03:27:11 · answer #5 · answered by svictor24 6 · 3 4

I agree with some of what he's done, and completely disagree with some of what he's done. It really boils down to the fact that he was the best available candidate on the ballot during the last two elections. I'm sure we could have done better.. but the choices just weren't there.

2007-08-27 03:45:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

He is a Criminal in violation of International Laws and the United States Constitution. Unfortunately the U.S. "opposition party" also serves the interests of Corporate America so they enable him. He was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple: He failed at every business adventure he tried but his Daddy and his Daddy's friends bailed him out. His politics of cutting taxes for the wealthy while cutting funding for the poor contradict the conservative idealism of "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" and "individuality."

How about I let George W. Bush show you himself:

(actual quotes)

"You know one of my hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the War on Terror." 9/6/06

"Make no mistake about, I understand how tough it is. I talk to families that die." 12/7/06

"If the Iranians were to have a nuclear weapon, they could proliferate." 3/21/06

"I think-tide turning-see, as I remember-I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of-it's easy to see a tide turn." 6/14/06

"Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."

2007-08-27 03:34:43 · answer #7 · answered by Richard V 6 · 3 3

I like him. When he says hes going to do somthing, he does it. Hes not a man of empty threats. As a terrorist, I would deeply dislike his harsh-on-terrorism policys.

Cassandra calls him a torturer, among other things. I expect shes refering to Abu-Grhab or Gitmo. As the brother of a soldier currently in Iraq, He tells me that Abu-Ghrab is a word the Iraqi's hate. Not because of what the US media says a couple Americans did there, but because of how Saddam would torture people for fun there.

2007-08-27 03:19:26 · answer #8 · answered by Conor H 2 · 5 4

I agree with the History Channel poll among 400 historians who ranked him the worst president of all time.

2007-08-27 03:22:12 · answer #9 · answered by Raven 5 · 5 4

He is nothing but a puppet controlled by banksters, corpsters, warmongers and other such greedy persons.

He is ushering in the North American Union behind the American publics back.

Not to mention he has obliterated the Constitution,

I think he should be found guilty of treason on that fact alone.

Oh yeah, He is a crook too!

2007-08-27 03:21:47 · answer #10 · answered by KTR 3 · 6 6

President Bush is one of the very few people amongst us who has friends, business and life experience in the Middle East; he understands this situation and knows what must be done. No disrespect intended, but all of our politicians put together would not have the life EXPERIENCE and KNOWLEDGE of the Middle East that our commander in chief GB has acquired.

2007-08-27 03:19:45 · answer #11 · answered by pacer 5 · 5 6

fedest.com, questions and answers