Lets face it .. its boring now ... you guys cannot be trusted to ensure we are entertained, and I think it should be left to the programme makers... and the housemates..
If we could not vote them out ... they may actually relax and be more entertaining
2007-08-26 23:01:32 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Reality Television
Actually .. I meant without the public voting AT ALL!!
2007-08-27 00:04:21 · update #1
i'm 100% with you on this one Dr. i think they should do this next time round, i mean if i were in the house today i know who i would have voted for long ago....yes, they should leave it up to the housemates to decide....spot on.....THE SWINES.....
2007-08-27 00:08:55 · answer #1 · answered by Dazzlebox 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
It would be SO much better! I honestly don't even understand what the point of the UK version is. I know it's the original...but it's nothing but a popularity contest and everyone is watching themselves cause they want the public to like them. The is no game to the show what so ever.
On the US version...it is totally up to the player who stays and who goes...It makes the player have to really use their brains and play a game. It's kinda like watching mice or piranhas..depending on the season. Also, once they get nominated...there is the 'power of veto' competition...so that way one of the people on the block have a shot at taking themselves out of thr running that week...thus the Head of House has to choose a new person to be voted on.
It's amazing what people will say and do in that situation LOL
2007-08-27 03:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've grown to like Freddy, I don't like Kris or Sree but agree it will be pretty boring without Sree. I hope a new housemate gets put in the house but 9 times out of 10 it doesnt make it any more interesting.
2016-05-19 00:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought the housemates did nominate to see who goes oh but then the public vote between those selected well pretty much the same as the us then so why change it
2007-08-27 01:14:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
don't you think the housemates would still vote out the good characters though? Charley would definately have been gone!
Mind you at least some of the other characters like Seany would have lasted for longer!
OMG though if they did it this year Carole would win! aaaaaaggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh!!
f*cking British public! lol
2007-08-27 00:55:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
BB wouldn't like that as it stop him making money from the show seeing that's the only real point to it in the first place. If the public didn't vote on evictions the show would be financially bankrupt after two weeks at most not that I would be sorry if that happened.
2007-08-26 23:21:34 · answer #6 · answered by alan c 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Maybe BB should chose and put up the worst or less entertaining house mates for the others to chose from.
2007-08-27 03:30:23 · answer #7 · answered by Afi 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yep that sounds like more fun get the viewers to vote and the ones with the least amount of votes get the hms to choose , like they used to on fame academy, would cause more trouble and in doing so be more entertaining
2007-08-26 23:56:59 · answer #8 · answered by ♥BEX♥ 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, half the fun is public voting x
2007-08-27 03:04:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In theory, but that was the twist the other week and Gerry ruined the fun by offering himself up to leave.
2007-08-26 23:36:11 · answer #10 · answered by truth_and_time_tells_all 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋