English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That we will not win any war until we completly and fully destroy the enemy! No diplomatic solution, no Liberal "solution", but the most simple solution of all: We kill them before they kill us. We need to hunt these terrorists down relentlessly. What do you think?

2007-08-26 17:11:05 · 12 answers · asked by Pace 5 in Politics & Government Politics

If most of you would acctually read my question you would realize that I did NOT metion Iraq once...

2007-08-28 17:00:49 · update #1

Having connections to 9/11 asside, Sadaam was still a dangerous dictator, no matter who or what he supported. No matter what we did in the war on terror, he had to be removed for the safety of the Middle East, and the World.

2007-08-28 17:05:56 · update #2

12 answers

agree with you totally, but heres the thing. america cant do that because to do that, many civilians would be killed and lots of wussies and liberals are against that.

2007-08-26 17:16:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

By all means, hunt them down relentlessly; but before we can do this, we must first realize that we can't afford to be distracted by nation-building impulses or the temptation to establish some Pax Americana that we can't afford and the world doesn't want.

I'm all for hunting down Osama and his cohorts, and supported the war in Afghanistan for that reason; but the war in Iraq was wrong-headed from the beginning. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, and had the manpower and resources that we've squandered there been used to hunt Osama, I think we'd have him on a slab by now. Instead, we're stuck in a useless quagmire and he goes free to strike at us again.

We made a huge mistake, and we've got to correct the thinking that got us into Iraq before we can successfully concentrate on hunting down and eliminating the real enemy.

2007-08-26 17:23:57 · answer #2 · answered by jeffersonian73 3 · 5 0

Fed what corporate media tells us huh? For us to destroy the "enemy" there wouldn't be anyone left but the government itself, everyone else would be detained or dead. The only real threat to our freedom has and will always be the government itself.

2007-08-26 21:31:27 · answer #3 · answered by Just keep breathin' 6 · 0 0

Hunt down where? I think its best if you guys just stay cool and take the necessary measures to combat and defend yourselves from terrorism.

Invading and raping countries will not work. Strong diplomacy is needed when dealing with terror threats in different countries.

2007-08-26 17:19:05 · answer #4 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 3 1

If you're talking about all the Iraqi people, are you prepared for the world to see you as a rogue nation and deal with you as being out of control and a danger to world peace?

2007-08-26 17:20:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

usa realizes what this is advised to realize. the zeroes have been including up using fact the beginning up of the final century. in case you think of in any different case, you're in simple terms between the multitudes.

2016-12-31 06:11:15 · answer #6 · answered by lindeen 3 · 0 0

Who are the enemy? Every time we kill an innocent civilian we create a terrorist.

2007-08-26 17:16:54 · answer #7 · answered by October 7 · 6 1

Right. But first we have to vote the neoconservativs out of office. Why? Simple---

>Al-Qaida is not based in Iraq--they are based in Afghanistan and now, primarily in Pakistan.
>Bush--and his supporters through their support of him-have DELIBERATELY given aid and comfort to the enemy by allowing them to have safe haven in Pakistan for the last 5 years, where they have rebuilt their organization, their bases, and their training camps.
>Therefore, we have to get these traitors out of our government befor we can go after America's real enemy--who are sitting safe and sound hundreds away from Iraq.

2007-08-26 17:22:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Amen bro! Finally someone who GETS IT! We are dealing with an extremely well funded and tenacious enemy. We have the resources to far exceed theirs and if we could support the troops we just might return to being THE world super power rather than just one of them.

2007-08-26 17:36:55 · answer #9 · answered by Carl M 2 · 1 4

wait,didn't "America"(USA is not America by the way) went to liberate Iraq not to completely destroy it?

2007-08-26 17:19:24 · answer #10 · answered by RX 5 · 3 0

Thats nice. And what does that have to do with Iraq again?

2007-08-26 17:17:22 · answer #11 · answered by ☺☻☺☻☺☻ 6 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers