Save the earth, for whom? The earth is fine, it is the humans who need saving, isn't it?

Question

This earth was here long before humans were and will be here long after we are extinct, it doesn't care if we save it for us, it will continue without us.

I keep hearing people say "Save the Earth". If all life ceased to exist on this marble, the marble itself would continue to go on and, who knows, probably it would be a better place.

Answer 1

I think you are absolutely right. The Earth needs no saving. What is Earth? It is simply a piece of rock that orbits a sun. It is not alive and cares about nothing. All these mottos of "Save the Earth" should be changed to "Save Ourselves". We don't want other species to go extinct because and we don't know which extinction will bring the ecosystem that we depend on to a complete collapse. We worry about global warming because of its possible effect on our lives. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Earth.

Life itself always finds a way to grow back. Once upon a time, 99% of life were wiped out. Life found a way to repopulate. The dinosaures went extinct. Mammals took over. If there comes a day when the Mammals are gone, including us, something else will take over. Look at Chornobyl. It might have caused humans to flee the area but not other life forms.

Bottom line, Earth doesn't need any saving. Life doesn't need any saving. We, as a specie that wants to survive, needs saving. All these changes that we fear are going to bring doom to our current species are simply preparing for the next group of species that can adapt better than we do. It is Darwin's surival of the fittest. Maybe we would do so much damage that life might not ever recover on this planet, but what does Earth, this piece of rock, care?

Answer 2

In a fashion you're properly suited, there is the previous George Carlin shaggy dog tale. "some people immediately difficulty some significant meteor miraculous the planet, 'The planet would be destroyed they say'.... Baloney., the Earth is a planet, and has been going around the solar for it sluggish now, hit by using many meteors, comets and stuff. So do no longer difficulty, the PLANET would be only effective, persevering with alongside in it incredibly is orbit.... the everybody is f*cked...however the planet would be only effective. " it incredibly is like that, crime, pollutants, international warming, incredibly do no longer impression the "planet" as such, - whether some sorts of pollutants might completely regulate some environments (which includes fairly radioactive fabric storage etc or smash mega-ecosystems (significant reef corals or some such). the undertaking i think of i discover quite compelling isn't - oh we ought to shop the earth via fact of X, yet quite what type of world can we depart our young ones, a international denuded of organic structures, an huge ocean equipment , systematically emptied in decrease than 60 years. We a number of this destruction is unavoidable, different factors - no longer plenty. Even have been we to % very properly, we'd nonetheless face intense problems as there are only too many people.

Answer 3

I have to agree with you. I don't think pollution is doing the Earth any good but I also have the feeling that a lot of the slight changes in climate and all that they point to as signs of global warming may be only natural cycles. Like the "little ice age" that took place in the early 1800s.
.
I suppose it like why would you cover your fabric car seats with vinyl to protect the upholstery, or floor mats to protect the carpet. Who are you saving the interior of the car for? So that it's worth more when you trade it in? Not likely. Who will ever get to enjoy the upholstery and nice carpet, the guy that buys it when you trade it in? What kind of sense does that make? The effort might have been better spent on regular oil changes and so forth.

Answer 4

A few questions: who told you that it's going to be all the time and where are you? If earth was here before us it's because the people back then didn't have cars and didn't have factories and all the kind of stuff that are making the earth like it is now, tornadoes are happening in places that have never happen before, same with earthquakes and it's all due to us changing the earth's lifestyle, maybe if you are old you won't see it die, but for us the young people, the teens and our kids it would be a messed up place to live, actually we won't live anymore, anything else...?

Answer 5

"Save the earth" is a phrase thats not meant to be taken literally. It means save the other life forms on the planet.

Humans are not the ones who need saving. On the contrary, the human species continues to over populate.

Answer 6

A few days between the creation of the earth and the creation of man isnt a long time,

and it wont b here long after us either,

but i do agree that humans r the ones that need saving

Answer 7

You have a point, but scientists are saying otherwise. Global warming, for example, is going to become more than just uncomfortable to humans, it's drowning polar bears and making it harder for other species to survive. It's destroying habitat!

It's not just us that needs saving. The others on the planet and then, the planet itself does too.

Answer 8

you got it wrong ........ you gotta save the earth from humans. it is not 'for whom' but 'from whom'

and humans don't need saving, we are supposed to be so intelligent that nothing can hurt us even though we are reeling under the effects of global warming, terrorism and jingoism.

if it is there after we are gone, we do not know becoz all we can be concerned about is now and us !!

Answer 9

it will continue without us,once we cease to exist because as humans we are destroying it,we destroy everything!! it prob will exist forever but be unable to accomadate humans,then it will be a better earth!! hahaha

Answer 10

You're absolutely right, save the humans first. Let's start with their habitat based on the unavailability of another one.