Publicity and "media worship", trying to sell her image like "Aunt Jemima" hotcakes, or pancakes, to a gullible public killed Lady Diana. I reject conspiracy theories like Charles or Clinton "had a remote control controlling" Diana's limousine to make it crash are for me ridiculous. It was an accident caused by the same publicity. What do you think?
2007-08-26 02:35:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
The same force that has killed many people, and ruined many lives. It is the Media.
2007-08-26 02:52:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Is it not about time this old chesnut was laid to rest? In the past 10 years there have been inquiries by every imaginable source. Nothing has been proved by any of them to suggest murder in any shape or form. The driver had been drinking, was speeding, and had drugs in his system, is that not simple enough? Oh, well at least it took some attention from the JFK conspiracy for a short time.
2007-08-26 02:56:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If she had been using the seat-belt, she would have probably walked away from the crash. It was made public that her Mercedes was not like the ones marketed in the USA. Why not? Did hers not have seat-belts or airbags? Nothing further was ever mentioned about this, anywhere. Why not?
2007-08-26 04:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by correrafan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A drunk driver interred a dark tunnel at high speed, and lost control trying to miss a slower car. Could some one have set it up well maybe, but if one continually does things that are risky the law of averages will catch up with you sooner are later.
2007-08-26 03:20:50 · answer #4 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He had to marry her by using fact the royal kinfolk mandatory an inheritor and a spare Dianas grandmother became on the factor of the Queen mom and that they truthfully arranged it. we are nonetheless undecided how she died in spite of the indisputable fact that it became in a vehicle collision interior the Pont de l'Alma street tunnel in Paris, France. on the time she became with a chum, Dodi AL Fayed and Dodi's father, Mohamed Al-Fayed (the owner of the Hôtel Ritz) claimed that the crash became a consequence of a conspiracy,and later contended that the crash became orchestrated by MI6 on the learning of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. Years later Prince Charles ultimately married his love, Camilla
2016-10-09 06:29:19 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows? Speculation has it she was a deep, ugly embarassment to the royal family. If she kept a low profile and went along with what it requires to be a member of the royal family she might be alive today. She thought, however, she was savvy enough in public relations to flee the royal family. Wrong move.
2007-08-26 03:30:16 · answer #6 · answered by mac 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
A 120mph car crash. Why didn't they just stay at the Ritz for the night?!
2007-08-26 02:49:09 · answer #7 · answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Media and The Paparazzi were relentless in their pursuit of Diana ,but it does not alter the fact that she was Murdered.
2007-08-26 02:41:21 · answer #8 · answered by Lindsay Jane 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I agree. Just a case of bad timing - and a notorious instance of DUI.
2007-08-26 02:40:50 · answer #9 · answered by Pete W 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Queen Elizabeth II killed her out of jealousy and spite. She had always dreamt of being a beautiful camera and guy magnet ...and here was her daughter-in-law, taking on the role that she had always wanted. The queen bribed the drunk chauffeur into crashing the car in the tunnel.
2007-08-26 02:42:23 · answer #10 · answered by MadameZ 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋