erm, yeah thats the question.
2007-08-26 00:32:27 · 18 answers · asked by FawneMine 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
i'm not sure but Billie-Jean is not his lover, she's just a girl that thinks that he is the one... but the kid is not his son...
2007-08-26 00:43:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Dr. Akward, He is a nice man who unfortunately helped out the wrong people who decided to take advantage of the money he had. He honestly just wants kids to have a childhood that is worth having, unlike his. He figured that many of the children he invited to Neverland would never get to go to Disneyland or Six Flags, so he gave them something that so many others take for granted, and instead of being grateful for him being a generous man, the families wanted more. I also dont think that a man who writes about the earth, and his missing childhood, and discrimination against people could honestly have it in him to hurt a child.
2007-08-26 06:34:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
NO! I feel that he loves children and some part of him he is still in that childhood phase. Lets not forget about the abuse he endured during his childhood. So in a way he is only reliving out his childhood, only in a better way. The way he wants with children around him which he did not have as a child. And still that shy guy we see from time to time still gives alot back to society from the millions he has. So once again NO! he is not a child molester.
2007-08-26 00:54:49 · answer #3 · answered by soomuchluv 2 · 6⤊ 1⤋
NO! This crap is old! You people have to let it go. There was no evidence to prove that Michael molested anyone! Instead of asking this stupid question go work out.
2007-08-26 10:13:47 · answer #4 · answered by Manapazza 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
no. If you look closer to the cases, the parents are very irresponsible, as if someone could say that the parents are intentionaly trying to smooch off money from michael jackson.
I liked michael jackson in the begining, but shame for he turning himself black to white.
But I still like him, and I know for sure he isnt a molester.
2007-08-26 00:37:21 · answer #5 · answered by Ge1st 1 · 6⤊ 2⤋
No.Evidence is clear and its bull i dont know why ppl "believs " what that lame *** parent said and retards are still belieivng that **** even when he is PROVEN innocent . They should be instead going after that mother for givin him a hard time instead
they still goes after michael i dont know why
2007-08-26 21:28:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No he is not, the accusations were made by gold diggers who wanted to get rich quick!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2007-08-26 02:48:55 · answer #7 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
he didnt turn himself from black to white he had a skin problem, why do people ALWAYS think he spay painted himself white!!!!!!!!!!! geez!
no in my opinion hes not a child molester, im just very glad he has a bunch of people on his side and still love him (from other countries) it would have been bad if he went to jail.
i think people just choose to believe he did it becuase they just dont like him becuase of the fact that he rose to fame, they'd rather believe anything then the truth which isnt fair.
another thing, one of the workers who worked at his park claim that she saw him doing inappropriate things to a child, so why didnt she report that much earlier then to just wait at the trial, people just want money!!!
2007-08-26 00:42:05 · answer #8 · answered by 9-pounds-lighter 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Nah, he just doesn't look like he could do it, he might like them, but I don't beileve he acts upon it
2007-08-26 01:00:05 · answer #9 · answered by Joule 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I believe that he has probably had inappropriate contact with children. However, the case for which he went to trial smelled like a setup.
2007-08-26 00:37:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋