English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the guy was just a cut rate thug murdered by his own movement. He was a loser.

2007-08-25 22:03:42 · 9 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers



I couldn't have stated it better!

2007-08-25 22:16:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Thug, Thug, is being eaten by cockroaches like Fidel will be soon. Chavez should join as cockroach meat too with Fidel, and Che.

2007-08-26 05:43:27 · answer #2 · answered by ram456456 5 · 0 0

Liberals believe that anyone who bucks the system is to be worshiped as an symbol of what they wish they could do, but don't have the guts to even attempt.

Passive-aggressive people mistakenly perceive any act of aggression for assertiveness time and time again.

2007-08-26 05:42:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

For liberals he is one of their main "poster boys". Today they are concerned their well worn Che t shirts will be of little value once Uncle Fidel Castro is dead. I have already started to mass produce Hugo (Chavez) t shirts for sale...Chavez will become the new poster boy for leftist nitwits.

2007-08-26 06:15:21 · answer #4 · answered by whyareyouaPOSER 2 · 1 0

I don't think it's fair to call him a cut-rate thug. He was a world-class thug.

2007-08-26 05:26:16 · answer #5 · answered by Thomas M 6 · 3 0

Why talk about Ghandi? He was a thug who overthrew the legitimate government and was murdered by his own movement.

Because he brought change to the people who needed it.

OH BUT WAIT. Ghandi wasn't anti-american. So that means he's a saint, wheras the instant America is portrayed as anything other than fantastic the movement is suddenly the devil incarnate.

2007-08-26 05:28:53 · answer #6 · answered by Mordent 7 · 0 5

People respect his concern for humanity and understand the world is about shades of grey. Understanding is not advocating remember. He was not mudered by his own movement, where did you study history?

2007-08-26 05:08:11 · answer #7 · answered by nicelyevolve 3 · 1 2

he was a pissant commie anti american
he was an advocate for socialism and marxism
he wanted a state run nation
yep he was a loser

2007-08-26 05:17:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You need to shop che-mart! NOW!

2007-08-26 05:15:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers