English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-25 17:19:53 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

9 answers

Absolutely. Since the soul is in every painting of every artist.

2007-08-25 17:32:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In a sense. If an artist puts their spirit into their painting/s, it's transformed many times. It's not so much parting, as sharing.

2007-08-26 01:12:55 · answer #2 · answered by Psychic Cat 6 · 3 0

that depends on how much she devoted herself.......
If I draw a ghost ....may be just for fun..not really pay much attention...if you ask me why I draw ghost, I myself do not know...but in people eyes...they will think "she must be having troubles or something...."
But when I really put my effort in my painting, I hardly show in public...unless I give to my good friends or show to my family and relatives. What they see usually is beautiful and romantic pictures......
If you ask when I inject my soul? I think should be painting which I put on efforts more.

2007-08-26 04:14:54 · answer #3 · answered by harijanti 4 · 0 0

I don't believe so. The painting is complete. It forever lives in her soul, whether it is in her physical presence or not.

2007-08-26 03:03:32 · answer #4 · answered by Marguerite 7 · 0 0

Nah, souls aint that easily parted.

2007-08-26 00:24:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

depend on the artist mind and whoever sees it .I'm out of stars for tonight I was close to a hundred but I will deliver my promise.

2007-08-26 00:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by @NGEL B@BY 7 · 0 0

Yes, always!

2007-08-26 00:23:27 · answer #7 · answered by ۞ Vixen ۞ 5 · 0 0

nope.
she resides at hearts.

2007-08-26 04:37:24 · answer #8 · answered by Riya- the li'l imp 4 · 0 0

what? no offence ur questions make no sense.

2007-08-26 00:22:43 · answer #9 · answered by Marie 3 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers