English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is there a government embargo on Cuba, but not china?

Additional Details

2 minutes ago
china has ICBMs pointed at the U.S.

2007-08-25 16:24:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkkUJp2pi3Q

2007-08-25 16:30:41 · update #1

to pac and carlos (still angry about his miami cuban rep mafia casinos and child brothels being shut down), not true, the U.S. gave heck to Russia and embargo, irrelevant to "bay of pigs" and U.S. "assets", so what up with china?

2007-08-25 17:15:54 · update #2

14 answers

good question... i'd like to know the answer as well.

2007-08-25 16:27:34 · answer #1 · answered by cronix 2 · 0 1

None of the respondants so far seems to have any idea why we have had an embargo with Cuba for so long, so here's the real reason: when Fidel Castro came to power, he seized many American business assets. The U.S. vowed to punish Castro for stealing them.

Way back in February of 1962, President John F. Kennedy established a trade embargo against Cuba to sanction Fidel Castro's communist regime, which seized control of the island in 1959, and then began to confiscate private property and other assets. This policy of isolating the island to force regime change has remained ever since.

The U.S. did not have assets in China, and hence its privatization of the country's assets had nothing to do with the U.S. We have a different strategy with China, and that is that open trade will eventually be fatal to China's insular Communist regime, forcing them to open up to the rest of the world. It has worked...maybe too well. China is still Communist, but they've latched onto capitalism like a barnacle on a ship's hull.

China realizes it cannot thrive economically by injuring the United States, and so most of the occasional hostilities are just empty rhetoric.

This is why we have an embargo on Cuba, but not China.

2007-08-25 16:49:25 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2 2

The US and Chinese economies are are so intertwined that anything hindering trade would put our economies into severve recession. It would even drag down the economies of the rest of the world. ICBMs are irrelevant to the amount of trade to occurs between the two countries.
The Cuban embargo is just silly and a throwback to events that occured in th 1950s. Castro would've been long gone if we opened up trade with Cuba 30yrs ago.

2007-08-25 16:33:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To embargo China would pretty much mean no more cheap stuff to be sold in the US. The amount of imports we get from China is enormous. Economics pretty much ties the US (and anyone else who imports from them) to China and anything that effects that will have adverse effects on the economy. Thats why they issue statements countering any negative type publicity (despite proof) that goes agaisnt their products. The fact that what effects one economy will have ripples whether large or small into other economies is a given in todays world.

2007-09-02 05:53:43 · answer #4 · answered by TxnLost 3 · 0 0

The reality is complex. First off, Cuba is 90 miles away from the US. China has a larger economy and in many ways, they're adopting open market systems faster than any country in history. And per capita, Cuba has FAR more human rights violations than any country in the modern world.

2007-08-26 02:00:46 · answer #5 · answered by shightfuhk 2 · 0 0

only evaluate the variation in sizes in each appreciate and you recognize why. Cuba is the dimensions of a state on a similar time as China is larger than U.S. in case you bear in mind the sanctions imposed after the TienAn adult adult males sq. crackdown, even the industrialized countries could no longer face as much as the catch of business enterprise possibilities there. The international sanctions fell aside very quickly. in the process the Clinton admin, we tried to hyperlink human rights with trades in coping with China. China's maximum appropriate instructed the pinnacle of Boeing in China that in the event that they are not getting the main sought after usa prestige prolonged, Boeing's a hundred jumbo jets contract would be cancelled. flow discern what befell in Congress after that... Clinton introduced they gained't tie human rights with trades with China anymore!

2016-12-12 12:02:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because of the Cuban export of FEAR. Proves Cuban economy inferior to capitalism - recent story - they are cracking down, eliminating small free enterprise (.01%) vendors who were making much money.

The Chinese export of inferior quality products seems to be realizing a goal of poisoning the USA and the World, even killing our pets. I admit to being upset with cheap tools that break and bend, and STINKING GARDEN WATER HOSE that won't twist properly.

The ChiComs goal seems to also be wasting our time, driving up the prices of scrap metals.

STINKING GARDEN WATER HOSE that won't twist properly!

Why don't they open that factory up in OHIO???
Oh, they want $13.68 per hour with lay off benefits of 1 year like the AUTOWOR$KERS. Sorry I asked.

2007-08-31 08:20:37 · answer #7 · answered by AmoreRose 2 · 0 0

Because Cuba and the U.S. had a very specific and very delicate conflict (see Bahia de Cochinos or Pig's Bay) which could have turned into nuclear freaking war... They never had any important or direct confrontation or threat from China during the Cold War.

2007-08-25 16:33:06 · answer #8 · answered by Carlos Mal 5 · 1 2

Because Cuba isn't significant for American business, and China is. If it is profitable for corporations, we are ready to forgive Human Rights violations.

2007-08-31 09:53:37 · answer #9 · answered by Stanislav B 1 · 0 0

Well since Slick Willie gave the Chi-coms the technology, it would not make much sense to get them mad at us, since they have the best missiles in the world now.

2007-09-01 05:34:26 · answer #10 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0 0

Because China is the biggest money lender for The Us

2007-08-25 16:28:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers