For #2, use the numbers 1 and -1. The sum is zero, which is less than the larger number.
For #5, use 1/4. The square root of 1/4 is 1/2, which is larger than 1/4.
For #6, use m = -2. Then (-2 + 1)/-2 = 1/2 < 1.
2007-08-25 16:37:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
===== Counterexample to Statement 1 =====
2 is even as it is divisible by 2, so it is not odd.
2 is prime since its only divisors are 2 (itself) and 1.
===== Counterexample to Statement 2 =====
(3) + (-3) = 0
0 < 3 (which means that 0 > 3 is not true)
The sum of the two numbers, 3 and -3 is not greater than the larger number in the sum, which is 3.
===== Counterexample to Statement 3 =====
3 * 2 = 6
3 ÷ 2 = 3/2 or 1 remainder 1 (meaning that 3 is not divisible by 2, so 3 is odd, and not even)
6 is the product of two numbers and is even, but 3 (one of the two numbers in the product is not even) as 3/2 is not an integer.
===== Counterexample to Statement 4 =====
(-1) * (-1) = 1
-1 < 0 (so -1 is negative, and therefore, not positive)
1 > 0 (so 1 is positive)
The product of two numbers is positive, but neither of those two numbers themselves are positive.
===== Counterexample to Statement 5 =====
The square root of 1/4 = 1/2.
1/4 > 1/2 (so 1/2 is not less than 1/4)
So let x = 1/4, then the square root of "x" is not less than "x"
===== Counterexample to Statement 6 =====
(-1) = 1 / (-1) = 0 / (-1) = 0
0 < 1 (so 0 is not greater than 1)
Let m = -1, which is a nonzero integer.
m+1 over m = 0 which is not greater than 1.
2007-08-25 16:38:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by darthsherwin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. 2 is the one and only example of an even prime number. Therefore, the conjecture is proved false.
2. Let -2 and 2 be the two numbers.
It can be proved that -2 + 2 < 2. Therefore, the conjecture is false.
3. Let 3 and 6 be the two numbers.
The product of 3 and 6 = 18 is even, but 3 is not an even number. Therefore, the conjecture is false.
4. Let -4 and -5 be the two numbers.
The product of -4 and -5 = 20 is positive, but -4 and -5 are both not positive numbers. Therefore, the conjecture is false.
5. Let the number x be 1.
The square root of 1 which is 1 is not less than 1 itself. Therefore, the conjecture is false.
6. Let the non-zero integer m be -1.
The value of (-1 + 1)/-1 = 0 is not greater than 1. Therefore, the conjecture is false.
2007-08-25 16:23:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
1. 2 is prime and even.
2. If both numbers are negative, this is false.
For example -1 + -2 = -3 and -3 < -1.
3. Only one need be even. For example 1*2=2.
4. The numbers could be negative. For example
-1 * -2 = 2.
5. This is false if 0
and .8 > .64
6. False. Let m = -1. Then (m+1)/m = 0.
2007-08-26 03:04:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by steiner1745 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. 9
2. 3+(-2)=1
3. 6 times 1/2
4. -2+(-2)
5. square root of 1/2 is less then 1/2
6. 1/2 is always greater then 1
2007-08-29 11:25:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) . . . false . . . . 2 is also prime
2) . . . true
3) . . . false .. . . at least one is even
4) . . .false . . . . 2 negatives can be positive
5) . . true
6) . . . true
2007-08-25 16:29:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by CPUcate 6
·
0⤊
2⤋