Although its hard to choose - because they are very opposite magazines - I would say Cosmopolitan because it's longer articles and more interesting. Talks about my life rather than the life of others...
2007-08-26 04:20:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by jdee 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
People. The articles are short and I get current info on who is doing what. Cosmo is a monthly that take several months of prep, editing, etc. so the news isn't current.
2007-08-26 02:30:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by knittinmama 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
People.
It's well written, and stays away from the trashy tales (for the most part)
Cosmo - and most other womens magazines frustrate me. There's too much repetitive information
2007-08-26 12:39:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like Cosmo. It's more open. People is kinda just like Time
2007-08-26 13:38:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by T*raci 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like People better
2007-08-26 14:52:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by akgirl1105 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cosmopolitan it has a lot of good articles...
2007-08-26 00:35:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by bluestar 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
people
2007-08-26 14:01:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by answermania 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i definitely prefer cosmo. in comparison people just doesn't do it for me. cosmo's got everything.
2007-08-26 13:36:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by stellar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer People much more!
2007-08-25 22:49:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Elisabeth B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
cosmo for me
2007-08-26 09:12:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by honeytree 3
·
0⤊
0⤋