I think that, in their minds, that anything that doesn't have to be paid for at the time of the service is "free." So, therefore, it's not necessarily selfishness, it's short-sightedness. And, this would explain much of the left's agenda. Being short-sighted would explain why they think raising taxes will reduce the deficit and pay for social programs. They can't see that in the long term, raising taxes will bring down the economy. Just look at Clinton. He raised taxes, and when he left office, he stuck Bush with a recession. This is also why they want to pull out of Iraq. They can't see that the result of this will be chaos and death. This is exactly what they failed to see when we pulled out of Vietnam, and chaos and death is exactly what happened there, not to mention making the US look weak in the eyes of our enemies. This is why radical Islam thinks they can get away with terrorism--because they think we are weak. Being short-sighted is the root of what is wrong with the left.
2007-08-25 14:36:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Trav 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Turn on the network news, this is why these poor deluded people think it is free, the media has been telling them the government will pay for stuff. If the media would just not lie, the government only has money it steals from us, if they would just say that 100 times a day for the next 30 years some of this people might get it,
but as it is, all they get is what the media tells them
If this country every fails the media will be fully complicit with the deed.
2007-08-26 08:27:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Guess what, when a family with no health care has a child with an ear infection, they can't go to a doctor's office so guess where they take them? The ER. The ER costs are paid for by the tax payers when the family has no money. And guess what? The ER costs at least 4 times what a doctor office would cost so...you do the math. We're already paying for those without health insurance. We're actually paying more than if these people had some type of government coverage.
2007-08-25 14:27:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eisbär 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
This left leaning independent knows better. I've been on Medicare for nearly ten years now and pay a hefty premium. My COLA's have been next to nothing because of this administrations method of deciding what the definition of inflation is. Medicare is a government health program that is paid for by it's participants jut like National Health Care will be. Until you see the proposal in writing in it's final form, don't judge it. I'd be dead without Medicare.
2007-08-25 14:42:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't, we are already paying them! Just ask the president of Anthem who makes a 2 Million dollar salary and a 12 million dollar bonus! And you really want to know why health care is so expensive.
It would be a damn shame to cut some of those people making obscene salaries and profits made off of the backs of the less than middle income! One-half of American Taxpaying Families make $25,000 a year OR LESS!!
I think you should start paying your share!
2007-08-25 14:41:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
They don't think they will be free, they know it will be dependent upon the taxes raised. But it gives the illusion that they are providing for those less fortunate. It creates dependency, and voters. Those too lazy to do it on there own, will rely upon them and vote to keep them in power.
The real question is... Why do those in other countries (with such health care) still come here for their health care needs ?
2007-08-25 14:27:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robert S 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is there a difference in "free" going to tax cuts, to corporations that don't even know that they are getting a tax cut?
Taxes, that probably would be going to the "Overcharging" health community?
Shifting "free" from corporations like "Halifurton" and others, would free up funds for the to be free to all those that need health care.........Don't you think?
and
Let's not mention the Iraq War and free money forgiven to other nations........Shift the funds from those sources and there you have it..."free health care"
Me-ism that you speak on, seems to be only the "right-ist and the left-ist" chosen special interest of theirs at that moment.
Mine, mine, mine! Gimme, Gimme, Gimme!
(except for you, you poor no account Americans)
Katrina didn't happen...La la la..I can't hear you.
I once saw a guy on TV that said.
"The difference between America giving aid to poor countries, is that those people in the poorer countries have no where to go to get health care"
Well we have places to go, but either no way to pay for it or it's making and evaluating going to the doctor or putting gas in your tank to get to the job, to pay for your over priced health care premiums!
2007-08-25 14:41:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
except its medicare or medicaid it is not a central authority wellness care plan. it quite is a wellness care plan from a private coverage organisation. the government merely will pay for the coverage, it does not manage the plan. government workers get supplied scientific coverage, merely like maximum different workers do. Thats a earnings of maximum jobs interior the U. S., you get enterprise paid scientific coverage.
2016-11-13 10:08:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess the left can stop invading countries and use that money for health care,should be even some left over
2007-08-25 14:23:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by RX 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
good question or comment bc no liberals have chimed in so far. there s nothing they can say but they love the "free" word.
most libs use the lower parts of their brains located in their a** to figure out politics. after all, they think raising taxes is best for all working ppl. its mind blowing and if they did less drugs, they would realize this
2007-08-25 14:29:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋