what are the differences between state and federal constitutions?

Answer 1

The federal constitution is for the whole US; whereas the
state constitution is for the individual state(s). But it does not supersede or override the federal constitution. The two go hand in hand.

Answer 2

The State Constitution covers only that State... The Federal Constitution covers all the States....

Answer 3

State constitutions have all kinds of quirks in them that only apply to each state. Federal constitution applies only to interstate trade and transactions, "if not explicetly given to the to federal government, it remains with the state"
Among quirks - Texas constitution now has hundreds of ammendments because founders did not trust legislature and restricted things that in other states are handled by laws, so we get to vote on a dozen or more ammendments each election on such things as whether the 6 biggest (or 2 biggest) cities in the state can set up a transportation or water district.
Texas legislature officially meets only once every two years and then only for 60 days which is absurd in this age. So the governor calls repeat emergency sessions, but these are only allowed to deal with the called topics. The governor has almost no other powers - those held by other state governors are distributed to other elected officials - like Agriculture Commissioner.
Many [mostly western] states in the 1860-1890's approved women voting for state officials long before the federal ammendment giving women the national vote.
At least one state (Nebraska as I recall) has only one house in the legislature (unicameral) instead of two.

Answer 4

Which state?

Answer 5

answer: in all probability no longer. Or he's banking that his ingredients are as ignorant as lots of the people posting in reaction to your question. The ninth Circuit governed that the California modification violated the 14th modification of the US shape. you are able to disagree with the ninth Circuit's diagnosis, however the thought a state shape supersedes the US shape, implied by using Santorum's comments, and expressed in writing by using a number of commenters, is ludicrous. As a federal prosecutor as quickly as suggested to a expert se litigant in a courtroom docket I exceeded off to be in, who replaced into making a matching argument to a choose, "That replaced into settled an prolonged time in the past in a sprint situation referred to as The Civil conflict." extra at the instant, see Brown v. Board of training.