California Governor Gray Davis destroyed a law made by voters. The law would have taken away benefits from undocumented workers. The pro-amnesty Democrat governor spitted on Democracy by overriding the votes of citizens.
First, the ACLU sued to have the law struck down. The liberal 9th "Circus" Court (whose rulings have been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court dozens of time) sided with the ACLU.
Then the Democrat killed the law by refusing to do his fiduciary duty to appeal Prop. 187 to the non-biased U.S. Supreme Court. Instead of appealing the law, the liberal sent the law into "arbitration". Arbitration is unheard of in a democracy. In arbitration, a group of hand chosen people were used to decide against the law.
That is about about as anti-American as it comes. Millions of California Democrats and Republicans went to the polls and voted for the law.
Davis was later kicked out of office and replaced by Arnold Swarzenegger.
2007-08-25
10:29:15
·
19 answers
·
asked by
a bush family member
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
"Proposition 187, the ballot issue approved by nearly 60% of California's population has been successfully annihilated by Governor Gray Davis as of July 27, 1999. The 1994 landmark ballot initiative was designed to deny illegal immigrants from receiving a slew of free social services. " http://citizensforjustice.org/gray/prop187.html
""But whoever suggested to Gov. Gray Davis that he mediate the constitutionally of Proposition 187 badly misunderstands mediation's role in our democracy and in dispute resolution. And if the mediation goes forward, both constitutional law and mediation are at risk."
Norman Brand "San Francisco based mediator, Los Angeles Times, May 6, 1999"
"Did the Courts Kill Proposition 187? No -- Gray Davis and Mexican President Zedillo Did"
http://www.americanpatrol.com/FEATURES/030811-DAVIS-KILLED-187/030811_Feature.html
2007-08-25
10:30:06 ·
update #1
Former Mexican President Zedillo:
"I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important, a very important part of it." July 23, 1997
2007-08-25
10:30:57 ·
update #2
Let's define terms first: Liberals hate Democracy. Senator Joseph Lieberman is a Democrat, and he is a fine man.
Liberals hate democracy because it is a splash of cold water in their little dream world. I used to just light-heartedly laugh at Liberals, but in the current age of terrorism, their once cute stupidity is actually life threatening.
Why do you think the majority of comediennes and actors are Liberals? It is often due to a sense of self-loathing. Al Franken, during one of his little hissy rants actually blurted out how much he hates himself. People like Jerry Seinfeld just do not like themselves, and use humor to mask the pain. Same for actors. They don't feel their real self measures up, so they like living in a fantasy world where they can be anything they want to be.
Democracy invades the safe, cocoon-like world of the Liberal because Conservatives challenge them and force them to open their eyes to the truth. It's like telling a self-deceived drunk, who thinks he's the life of the party that he's got an alcohol addiction. This is why Libs lash out so violently. They'd do anything to avoid the truth.
You just have to understand one simple fact about human nature to realize why Liberals act the way they do.
Have you ever helped a friend who was in a bad situation, but you helped perhaps a little too much, so instead of you being appreciated, your friend became distant and sullen? It's common for people who receive help to end up feeling resentment instead of gratitude. This is because no one likes to feel indebted to anyone. It makes them feel inferior and that makes them angry.
This is the Liberal mentality 100% On some level, Liberals realize that, if it weren't for the protective cocoon of the United States, which allows even lazy and undeserving people to enjoy a level of success that would be considered spectacular in many countries. The undeserved success makes Liberals feel a huge amount of resentment towards their benefactor: The United States of America.
This is why Liberals want the U.S. to fail, and for Democracy to have a tarnished image. Their subconscious can't reconcile its feelings of indebtedness towards the U.S., so instead it blindly lashes out with hatred, hoping to bring down the U.S. to their own level.
The U.S. is like a real, flesh and blood hero. We've saved countless lives and helped more people than every other nation on earth combined. Since Libs don't believe in heroes (heck, they won't even admit Reagan's greatness), they have to denigrate everyone who is special, and demean noble ideas as corny, out of date relics.
Keep in mind, most of what drives Liberals is subconscious, but if you get Liberals really steaming mad about something, they will sometimes reveal their innermost thoughts, thoughts they didn't even consciously know they had. For example, I made one Liberal so mad he finally blurted out, "Oh yeah? Well maybe the U.S. doesn't deserve to be so powerful. We don't deserve all this stuff we've got. It was just too easy."
You see? It's a feeling of self-loathing, just like when you hear the immature rants of a damaged psyche like Al Franken. Why do you think so many comedianes are Liberals? It's due to feelings of inadequacy. They use humor to mask their pain.
Now, I'm not going to parrot Michael Savage who said Liberalism is a mental disorder, but...
2007-08-25 12:30:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, first off, understand this about politics. It's all just a big game to get us to point fingers at each other.
We all say things like, I'm democrat, I'm republican, liberal or neo-con.
Haven't you figured this thing out yet? It's all just a big game. We're led down roads so that we will believe that one candidate is bad (not knowing the powers that really run any particular candidate's agenda is what really controls that candidate).
You haven't noticed that our President disregards the Constitution on a regular basis? It's not him who really disregards but the powers that really run the office of the Presidency.
Our country is in very dangerous times and right now we all are skating on thin ice and soon that ice will break. The trouble is this--the captain of the ship will not go down with us.
And, before I forget to mention this--Arnold is the son of a high ranking Nazi officer. President Bush (Sr.) even said that Arnold would make a good President.
Do you really think Arnold is out for the good of the people? He, like every other politician, is controlled by the global elite. His agenda's are controlled by them.
2007-08-26 03:37:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's extra most important to the DNC to keep celebration cohesion and hinder offending the black supporters than it's for them to appreciate and honor democracy. If they gave the Fl and Michigan delegates a whole vote, in keeping with how the votes have been solid, then it could offend a massive section of the celebration base and blacks could now not prove in November. So, it grew to be extra most important to soothe a few celebration electorate than to choose a candidate who can win in November. Clearly the pursuits of the nation was once located moment to "celebration cohesion". That selection made it transparent to me that the Democrats aren't the celebration to symbolize me any more. After 18 years of vote casting directly democrat, I have simply been satisfied to deliver my fiscal aid and my vote to the Republicans.
2016-09-05 14:01:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Democrats used to be liberal. Liberal at the time was a good thing. Liberal meant that you believed and stood up for what was right, for the average American. Over the years liberalism was distorted and mangled, it's own good ideals consuming themselves. Today's liberals have no connection with you or I. They feed off us to sustain themselves! We pay the price for the ideas our ''liberal leaders'' dream up. They themselves, meanwhile stay far away from any actual involvement, be it financial (first and foremost) or otherwise.
2007-08-25 10:46:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because the Goal of the Democrat Party is to turn the US into a Socialist/Communist Nation.
Democrats want the United States to become the "North Korea of the West".
2007-08-25 10:36:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by wolf 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Democrats are a breed of their own.
No one can produce the hate and intolerance of a Democrat that doesn't get his way on something . Just try arguing with one...as long as you agree with them its fine, but once you try to do what they preach, which is voicing an individual opinion, they will turn on you like a rabid dog.
2007-08-25 10:39:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
And taking away money for healthcare and public education as Arnold is doing ok? Granted, Davis probably did a terrible job, but not worse than Shwartzenegger, or however the hell you spell his dumb name. Even people who voted for him are and have regreted it.
2007-08-25 10:40:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Zoe S. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
When three wolves are voting against two sheep, guess what's for dinner?
Or maybe you'd really like another French Revolution. Is there some real reason why rich brats never seem to understand the lessons of the past?
-Maybe that's why there's another idiotic Viet Nam style war going on as we speak. Bush thinks we should have stayed a few more years there. I remember him getting a draft deferrment and wiggling out nicely, with help from his bigshot daddy. Like a note from home, huh?
2007-08-25 10:34:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Liberals hate anything that gets in their way and will resort to anything to accomplish their goals.. They don.t want standards since they don't want to be judged themselves.
They also are very naive in thinking there are no enemies.
They fancy themselves as being very compassionate and intellectual. while in reality they are too cowardly to have standards.
Finally the above criticism would be categorized by them as " hate speech" They should listen to themselves.
2007-09-01 09:28:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Please stop your consumption of the goods and services created by those pesky foreigners that scare the bejesus outta you!
Cut your own lawn. Pick your own crops. No nannies. No wine. No fast foot. No massages.
These people are actually human and are not slaves. They should be treated with respect for they help our economy.
You are a hypocrite if you enjoy the benefits of their labor and treat them still as sub-humans!
2007-09-01 10:39:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bob from Mars 4
·
0⤊
1⤋