Do you that the JEEPERS CREEPERS movies are underrated? I thought the first movie was GREAT! second one was ok. . . But in general, I think it dosen't get recognized it should. Especially the Creeper. He's a great character! I think he's underrated as well. What do you think?
2007-08-25 10:01:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I agree with townie and abbynormal. The first part of the movie was terrific-when the kids are driving down the road and they pass the Creeper by the side of the road...creepy! But having him be this supernatural creature...not scary at all. Abbynormal's dead on: having him be a creepy human would have been much scarier than what the Creeper turned out to be.
2007-08-25 10:54:38 · answer #1 · answered by Bookworm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that the Creeper was cool but the movies sucked. Where did he come from? Who is he? Cats are afraid of him...okay we know that, and he likes the song jeepers creepers. Other than that we don't know anything about him. The movie could have had a better story line. Maybe Rob Zombie can re make it.
2007-08-25 10:22:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I disagree with you: I saw the original Jeepers Creepers (although I never saw the sequal), and I thought it was one of the worst horror films I'd ever seen. I tend to really dislike movies that don't really give any backstory as to why what happens happens.
: )
2007-08-31 03:20:06 · answer #3 · answered by rockiebattles411 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought the first few minutes of the first movie were great. They ruined it by making the guy behind the wheel a fricking demon (or whatever he was). It had great potential... all ruined by the "Creeper." They should have had it be some crazy whacked out man. Woulda seemed more plausible.
2007-08-25 10:31:15 · answer #4 · answered by Abby_Normal 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I will fully agree with you. The first one was great. The second one still really good. you dont see this very often with lower budget horrors. The monster has a great bases and is really well done. I wish that they would make a number 3
2007-08-25 10:07:14 · answer #5 · answered by Leebert51 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Napolean Dynamite
2016-04-01 23:21:19 · answer #6 · answered by Michele 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, i agree. the first 20 or so minutes of the first movie was brilliantly done. the ending or reveal of the creeper did kill it for me, but not so much that i didnt see the 2nd. once u accept it's a supernatural horror, u live w/ the man-bat-thing concept. as far as backstory, i love that as much as the next person, but i think not knowing what or who he is adds to the terror. u are experiencing him as his victims would. plus, knowing what he is could give u insight into how to kill him, if possible. i'm not ready to kill him yet.
2007-08-31 08:57:13 · answer #7 · answered by celticriver74 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was more like a comedy than a horror movie, especially the second one where the creature was licking the high school bus window, so funny.
2007-08-25 10:06:20 · answer #8 · answered by GBMC 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought the movie where the kids are on the school bus out in the country was terrifying, that thing was absolutely frightening!
2007-08-25 10:06:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually thought the movie was even more OVER rated when it was called a horrendous piece of cinematic fecal matter.
2007-08-25 10:05:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋