1st of all, NO ONE HERE IS IN YOUR LEAGUE!
2nd Why would u get rid of Chad for Colston?
3rd this is the football section, not fantasy
2007-08-25 09:00:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
chad johnson's more proven obviously and a more sexy name. but colston should get at least as many opportunities as the no 1 for the saints and there's no reason he won't produce just as much. its a toss up.
2007-08-25 15:54:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by jizdepski 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO!! But I will give you Michael Vick in the trade. OH!!!! I am sorry, I forgot I gave him to the Dogs
2007-08-30 12:21:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by jim m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure, no problem.
How about I give you Gossman for Peyton Manning too?
2007-08-25 17:37:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr R 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Seriously though, that might be a good deal. Johnson will be double teamed. Colston won't be as guarded. Still, HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-08-31 17:43:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
get a life this is soft world
yiu need to be productive at dAYS
2007-08-25 16:15:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael M 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No ones in ur league
2007-08-25 15:46:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnoooooooooooooo
2007-08-30 09:09:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what
2007-09-01 22:52:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by x3blackcats 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
WHY???
2007-09-02 13:45:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋