No. If he told you that, tell him nice try and to come back when he has a tumor.
2007-08-25 07:58:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bill 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Kind of. I saw some study a few years back that showed that Catholic priests who are supposed to be celibate had something like twice the chance of married men the same age to have prostate cancer.
The conclusion was that not having frequent ejaculations seemed to increase the risk of cancer developing.
Proving the old saying "Use it or lose it" I guess.
2007-08-25 08:01:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
this is genuine that learn has reported that prevalent ejaculations can shrink the prospect of contracting prostate maximum cancers in later existence, i've got related link to comments on 2 such surveys, the 2nd being finished on virtually 30,000 adult adult males, over 8 years, so must be quite precise. i've got under no circumstances examine up on Islam, so i won't have the capacity to remark on that religions view of masturbation, yet truthfully in Christianity, there is not any point out of masturbating being sinful, even although some christians declare this is. i do no longer think of that abstaining for a month is going to electrify you, yet you ought to submit to in ideas the attainable long term consequences of abstinence.
2016-10-16 23:21:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex or more precisely ejaculation is important to prostate health. Never ejaculating could conceivably lead to problems, but then again simple masturbation will clear his pipes it does not have to be sex.
2007-08-25 08:00:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
We found that these women valued sexuality and participated in sexual relationships and activities at a rate similar to women who had not been through cancer treatment, but they were not adequately prepared for the sexual issues that their cancer or its treatment introduced," study author Dr. Stacy Lindau said in a prepared statement. The sexual problems included pain and limited lubrication.
Two out of three women whose reproductive and sexual organs were severely compromised by the treatment also reported that their doctors never brought up sex, according to the study.
Writing in the August issue of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center researchers expressed concern that if doctors are not discussing the impact of medical treatment on sexuality under these circumstances, sexual health was even less likely to be discussed in other situations, particularly with older women. Previous studies have shown that patients are themselves reluctant to bring up sexual issues.
The research team surveyed 219 women aged 40 to 50 years old who had been treated for a rare form of vaginal or cervical cancer. The women were all members of a registry for people who might have been exposed to synthetic hormones while in their mother's womb. Most of the women had been treated with surgery or radiation therapy when they were in their late teens or 20s and had survived more than two decades after their diagnosis. The researchers then compared the responses from these women with race- and age-matched controls selected from a 1992 national study on sexual norms.
The cancer survivors reported more sexual problems and four times more health problems that interfered with sex all or most of the time, but they were just as likely to be married as the comparison group. Fifty percent of the survivors reported three or more sexual problems, compared to 15 percent of their peers. They were also seven times more likely to feel pain during intercourse and three times more likely to have difficulty lubricating.
More than one out of three survivors complained about the scars from their treatment as well as frequent bladder infections and incontinence.
Those of the survivors who reported a conversation with their physician about the sexual impact of treatment were the women who were more likely to have three or more sexual problems at the same time.
http://doiop.com/rx24-7
2007-08-25 08:53:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO, if he told you that so he can have more sex, then dump the OLD dude!
2007-08-25 08:01:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, don't let some guy spring that one on you!
.
2007-08-25 07:58:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Robert L 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont think so, im with the others, i think its a scheme
2007-08-25 15:27:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by dtownrep09 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
damn!
if that's true than i guess i know how I'm going to die.
2007-08-25 07:58:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it is a very good possibility!!
2007-08-25 08:02:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by sweetcakes69 2
·
0⤊
1⤋