Why did it take pressure from the families and public for an investigation?Why did it take public pressure for the de-classification of the PDR titled "BinLaden determined to strike inside US"?Why did Bush refuse to be sworn in and testify before the 9/11 commission?Why did he only agree to meet with the commissioners behind closed doors with Cheney in attendence?Why weren't they at least interviewed seprately?How can we believe men who won't stand before the public and swear to tell the truth?
2007-08-25 07:22:07 · 11 answers · asked by honestamerican 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I am looking for an honest republican(hard to find nowadays) for an answer.......not one of the paid trolls!
2007-08-27 05:32:48 · update #1
Your answers, in order are:
1. This administration was either directly involved, knew about the impending attacks and intentionally did nothing to prevent them, or at best they were extremely incompetent.
2. Same reason as #1.
3. Because he was going to lie and didn't want to be busted for perjury.
4. Obviously he had plenty of time to prepare his story so his lies would not conflict with the lies that the others involved were telling. But he is such a moron that he could not be counted on to follow his script if he was asked any difficult or unexpected questions. He could have slipped up and accidentally revealed some truth, which has been known to happen on occasion. So he needed someone smart like Cheney with him to make sure that didn't happen.
5. The Democrats were too weak and spineless to force this, and if they tried, the Republicans would have all stuck together to prevent it. On any police show when there are 2 or more criminals, they always separate them during questioning to see if their stories conflict and they can catch them lying.
6. We can't. These people are proven liars and criminals. Bush even admitted to committing an impeachable offense (illegal wiretapping), and no one is trying to impeach him.
2007-08-25 07:43:12 · answer #1 · answered by Alan S 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's hard to look and see how people like DaLinkWent or think that it's a national security issue or something. Some people are just so gullable to the governments way of trying to cover things up. Stop turning your back to the truth. If you still believe that Bush wasn't behind these attacks then you must be stuck back in 2001.
2007-08-25 17:32:17 · answer #2 · answered by Jacob 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of your questions have already been answered to the benefit of you Liberal S-Ps. That's OK. You don't want to be confused with facts any way so we stopped trying. Now we laugh at you in your weak attempts to discredit this administration with your mewling and whimpering.
You should be concentrating on which of those Has-Beens, done- nothing, doing nothing, lost Left Wing Kook Bars, you want to nominate.
Oh, is it the one who wants to take her health care plan and punish you and your doctor for caring for you? Or, is it the first term senator who continues to step on his pee-pee with all those foreign policy faux pas? Or, is it any one of the others who have taken money from the Far Left, Move On.orgasm or Uncle George Soros? Great field to chose from. How many are you so proud of you would take the energy and time you expended here and write something in favor of ANY of them? I, thought so. Y'all don't have a clue, do you?
Don't be surprised when January 19, 2008 comes along and we hear you whining that the election was stolen......AGAIN!
2007-08-25 14:57:06 · answer #3 · answered by jube 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clearly, the Bush Administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. I did not want to believe it, who would? But, the evidence is just too overwhelming to ignore. The dots are all there. All we have to do is connect them. Here is a video that explains everything - even with a sense of humor.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3401925678922201999
2007-08-25 14:47:15 · answer #4 · answered by BlueSue 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it would have been too embarrassing for the government to reveal how incredibly incompetent our defenses were and how woefully bad our CIA is.
Now of course we know these things, but it's natural for someone to not wish to cast illumination on their bungling.
As for Bush, he's just totally clueless. He's probably afraid of making a fool of himself if he had to speak impromptu. The only thing he's covering up is his unbelievable stupidity.
2007-08-25 14:42:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They needed the time to tidy up loose ends, and make sure the set-up wasn't too obvious.
2007-08-25 14:56:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because he needed time to cover up his 'evil deeds' when he hired the minions of the Saudis to blow up the towers and plant the bomb or missile to the pentagon and hire other to fly united 93....or any of those stupid theories..take your pick and adjust your foil hat, it is cutting off your blood supply to your brain.
2007-08-25 15:04:16 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you find this relevant five years later... did national security ever come to mind.
2007-08-25 14:38:06 · answer #8 · answered by DaLinkWent 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Obviously you already believe that the administration is behind September 11th based on your word choice, so why exactly are you asking this question? Please promptly log out and never log back in, troll.
2007-08-25 14:48:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
We all know why. He had some inside info'. The whole truth has yet to be told.
2007-08-25 14:35:27 · answer #10 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋