English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am a practical person who is neither an extreme conspiracy theorist nor an extreme skeptic/debunker. That being said, lets get to the question. Keeping your personal opinions and beliefs aside, please answer this question in your most scientific, third person, practical manor.

Q: Why would Federal and/or local authorities withhold footage from three Virginia Department of Transportation 24hr traffic and road condition cameras which filmed permanent fixed angles outside the Pentagon, that contain the cleanest footage and images of the attack on the pentagon? Remember, this is a straight forward question that does not ask for personnel beliefs or opinions about situations that took place on 9/11. Thank You.

2007-08-25 05:26:43 · 8 answers · asked by s g 2 in News & Events Current Events

20-24 frames per second

2007-08-25 05:47:55 · update #1

8 answers

I don't think you are going to get any scientific, logical reasons because there is only one good explantion.

2007-08-25 05:33:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

For this answer you dont even need to use critical thinking skills.
Logically speaking as much evidence that has been accumulated it would be in the best interest of the government to show this footage to dis spell the theory that it wasn't a plane that hit the pentagon. They will not therefore one can only come to the conclusion that something is wrong. there where actually over 15 cameras that would have shown what hit. If you still have doubts I have a chilling interview below that everyone must see.
Information is power.

2007-08-25 13:09:05 · answer #2 · answered by stephenmwells 5 · 0 0

Simple. The portion of the Pentagon which was struck and exposed by the plane crashing into it contained a great deal of classified material and equipment. If you review the list of the military dead, the enlisted toll is heavily weighted for the information specialist community. Those are the folks who run the computers and cypher equipment used to monitor trouble spots in the world.
The reason you have not heard any of this from the media is that their reporting was abysmal at best. Since most of them were working in mid-Manhattan outlets, the focus was on the events around Church and Vesey Streets in lower Manhattan.

2007-08-25 13:30:48 · answer #3 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0 0

One possible answer is that these same cameras did not actually record clean, clear footage. They may have been damaged in some way or even obscurred. A camera at a fixed angle would not be able to adapt to anything blocking it's view and it would record only a fraction of time as something passes in front of it.

2007-08-25 12:34:02 · answer #4 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0 2

I dont know why they would do that, im so scared living in this world we are just little lemmings following along to the rules that the government sets up for us, we are all disposable and were not allowed to carry weapons to defend ourselves, discipline our kids properly so they dont grow up to be shits, and we get fined and jailed if we attack a burglar in our own home? its scary how little control we have over our own lives

2007-08-25 12:38:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

why don't you show some kind of proof before spouting off

2007-08-25 17:55:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

http://usinfo.state.gov/media/misinformation.html

2007-08-29 02:14:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

maybe they were just embarrassed about it.

2007-08-25 12:35:04 · answer #8 · answered by failurbydsign427 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers