Why does Myspace allow young, ignorant users to whore themselves over the Myspace to get more people on their friends list, thus ruining it for the mature, level-headed people, just to increase the amount of attention they potentially get from their "friends"?
Why are people on the Internet like Dane Cook, Tila Tequila, and Jeffree Star idolized?
Is there a statistical figure for how many potential stalkers or predators there ARE on Myspace?
Answer that, and I will ask no more.
2007-08-25 04:28:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Betwixt & Between 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Why does myspace continue to allow small children to break their TOS by lying about their age?
Why do younger teenagers continue to give out personal information, essentially making a buffet for internet predators?
2007-08-25 04:13:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by I Know Nothing 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why are pictures of a woman feeding her baby (breastfeeding) deleted ..... and pictures of teens in bras and panties NOT deleted?
2007-08-25 04:19:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can get the solutions to these kind of questions within the voluminous files which have been published by way of the Courts. All Casey's peers and household stated that she was once a "photo-taker," that's, she took plenty and plenty of photos, of household and peers. She published them in every single place the web, on her Facebook account, her photobucket account, and so forth. There are good over a thousand snap shots of Casey within the ownership of legislation enforcement. She additionally amassed snap shots different humans took of her and published the ones as good, whether or not they had been flattering photos or no longer. This was once simply ordinary conduct for her -- taking photos and posting them. In addition, different humans published snap shots of her after her arrest -- lots of them displaying her partying as though she didn't have a care on the earth. The extra telling query is: why did Casey delete greater than two hundred snap shots of her daughter off her internet sites among June 2008 and her arrest in July 2008? Moving on: she deserted her automobile in "this sort of public location," for the reason that THAT is in which it ran out of fuel. In average Scarlett O'Hara type, she informed her boyfriend "I'll deal with it later," however "later" by no means got here. After three days it was once towed. Moving on: both Cindy or George watched Caylee whilst Casey went out at night time, or Casey took her to those events. Friends have testified that little Caylee was once at "grownup" events with Casey, adding the Anything-however-garments social gathering in May. Moving on: the tale sounded well to her -- and he or she was once so used to mendacity (her dad and mom known as her pathological), and having humans consider her, she in general proposal they might move on believing her. Even whilst her dad and mom proposal matters weren't rather correct, they by no means went as far as to investigate matters out, which, might be, might have stored Caylee. Moving on: Only Casey is aware of why she used the duct tape. It is surmised both to hold Caylee quiet or to preserve a chloroform pad in location. Either manner, the center-formed decal was once simply macabre! Finally, why is Casey's "abduction" situation so incredible. First, Casey's possess brother by no means heard approximately a "nanny" till the night time Caylee was once suggested lacking. Second, police have adopted wide leads and feature been not able to find "the" Zenaida Gonzalez who babysits (the character Casey stated announced her to the babysitter is aware of Casey, however does no longer have a son and does no longer recognize who Zenaida Gonzalez is). They additionally checked her mobilephone cellphone and pc and will discover no proof of her sending or receiving messages to or from any one related to Caylee, both earlier than or after her disappearance (and their files move from April 2008 to August 2008). In such a lot circumstances, in actual fact practical, and does not want correcting. Casey has transformed her tale no less than three instances (one million to police, one million to Lee and one million to Cindy), both wholly special experiences or with mild variants. The tale she informed police has been verified to be ninety nine% unfaithful - the one precise factor that Casey stated was once "I have no longer noticeable my daughter in 31 days." Everything else was once simply such a lot BS. Innocent humans don't have got to falsify or beautify the data. Casey is now announcing "I didn't homicide my daughter," and this will, correctly, be precise. But I do consider she did play a BIG function on this little lady's loss of life, and loss of life by way of negligence is homicide however, mainly once you have led your household and legislation enforcement on a merry dance, denying that something "unhealthy" occurred to Caylee in any respect.
2016-09-05 13:36:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋