2007-08-25 00:13:42 · 15 answers · asked by alphabetsoup2 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Americans should not accept surveillance-of americans vote ronpaul2008. the only vote for democracy
2007-08-25 00:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by rooster 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. I suggest that all transactions, e-mails and phone calls made by our politicians be made a matter of public record. Along with than, we need to know about their finances.
These are the people who need to be under scrutiny. They are the criminal class.
2007-08-25 06:09:22 · answer #2 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hell no!
Tell the government to F off, they need a reality check. Bad.
2007-08-25 01:09:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure, why not. We should give up all of our rights and liberties in the cause of fighting terrorism and just be grateful that we’re still alive.
2007-08-25 00:22:04 · answer #4 · answered by quest for truth gal 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No please cite where this is going on with the exception of monitoring incomming international calls from know terrorist operatives.
The government as you put it needs to show cause and get legal court orders to see your emails, bank records etc.
2007-08-25 00:21:54 · answer #5 · answered by whyareyouaPOSER 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hell yes! Unless you have something you are covering up, this should NOT bother you in the name of defending this country!
2007-08-25 01:38:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. And the government does not do those things without a warrant.
2007-08-25 00:25:48 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, under any circustances.
Of course treason should also be prosecuted and dueling should still be legal.
2007-08-25 00:20:27 · answer #8 · answered by Alan C 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If the purpose is to stop terrorists I think it's OK. If abused...
Well, have you ever heard of George Orwell...?
2007-08-25 00:19:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
only those from overseas terrorists.
then, we shouldnt accept it, we should demand it.
2007-08-25 00:32:58 · answer #10 · answered by karl k 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋