Is the promise of a Politician before election only to deceive publics and not to fullfill?

Answer 1

yes mostly many promises when next election time comes few are fullfilled and new are made again not to fullfill

Answer 2

Only partially. As long as they can be called to account by another election soon, they'll have to deliver on some or most of their promises.

That's why a free press is so important; people have to know what the elected officials are actually doing. And that's why the people need the right to free speech, and the right to demonstrate publicly in an orderly way. All these are safety valves to prevent the politicians' inevitable abuse of power.

Answer 3

Generally there are issues that Politicians say that they will cover, and then drop, but that is often because of the theory called the "run to the middle". Before the individual party primary, Candidates act much more rashly. Democrats act more left leaning, and Republicans act more right leaning. This tends to get as many voters as possible in the Primary election. After they get elected in the primary, most candidates will act more much central, not leaning too far to the left or to the right, in order to capture as many undecided voters as they can. This means that many issues that they promised to resolved don't get the attention they were promised.

Answer 4

its not that they always wanted to deceive public by making false promises but the thing here is that they make big promises which aren't realistic just to seek people's attention so that they get as many votes they can and at the end they fail in fullfilling their promises.

Answer 5

unquestionably no longer, yet no longer for the reason you think of. i think that there are 2 issues at artwork which maximum people ignore. the main mandatory one is etiology. look it up. it incredibly is the learn of causation or extra especially how we % out and start to % out causation. Having examine Arthur C. Clarke's and Fred Pohl's debts of their efforts to be open approximately alien deliver's decrease back interior the Sixties and Nineteen Seventies, I earlier reached the top myself that lots of the occurences we've documented advise there are problems with "purpose" reality, and because there are maximum of alternative issues which advise such problems, such via fact the learn used in behavioral economics, until eventually there's a extra suited expertise of the irrational in rationalism and the scientific approach, then it is not going this data would be presentable in any way which will fulfill a central authority or every physique else. In different words, it incredibly is out already and hasn't confident every physique. the 2nd situation is exactly that plenty is military, and the army business complicated's power. They of all everybody is knowledgeable in dealing with the e book and preserving precise records, the two issues that may no longer amenable to. they do unlike records going public, and that i'm taken aback and disgusted by using Obama's willingness to deal with them -- under no circumstances ideas Julian Assange there is the GI who leaked the stuff. the hot Daniel Ellsberg is being dealt with like the hot Julius Rosenberg. this is meant to be a equipment of tests and balances and particularly situations issues are not meant to circulate easily. The founding fathers have been very sparkling on that element or as Churchill suggested Democracy is the worst political equipment until eventually you look at each and all of the others. it is not that i think of the army are heavies in alien deliver learn: I only think of they have the LEAST competence to make intense judgements approximately what constitutes data and what constitutes considerable data. via fact of this i do no longer think of Cameron for example gets the records that are on the floor because it have been.

Answer 6

The only intention a politician has is to be elected!
They play to the audience on the campaign trail...liberal speeches in the northeast and west coast..conservative in the heartland..the nationally televised "debates" has made traditional politicing more difficult, but if you follow them you will see waffling on issues and mind changing based on the latest poll of what the voters want

Answer 7

ganda, wow, where have you been for 7 years. Your leaders wrote the writ of habeas corpus out of the Constitution and 9 of the first 10 amendments.

Some honestly try to fullfil what they can, however, most times they have no control over what is or isn't passed. Some will say anything, even lie, like George Bush!

The ones I find particularly deceptive are those who make promises that are not even in their power to change!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZY5BwMjpUOI&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o

Answer 8

A very good example of that is the current "demon"cratic led congress. Who promised many things that would change and have only succeeded in getting a measly $7.25 minimum wage bill through. Time for a real change. Hand congress back to the republicans so Fred Thompson can move America back in front of the Chinese.

Answer 9

The promise of a politician remains forever a promise.No one can fault them on that.

Answer 10

Not all, but some will say anything and pander to all, just to get the votes, knowing exactly what they are doing and with full intentions of not doing anything they promised to do.