If your lover was a dish, what would he/she be?

Answer 1

English Toffee Capuccino - warm, smooth and sweet.

Answer 2

My lover would be a salsa. Sweet start of a fruit, blended into a tart counter fruit, a vegetable with a crunch, a spice or two, and a fresh herb....a salty finish to complete the journey over my tongue....slightly peppery....

*blush*

Hope this answer works....

Answer 3

A RA-dish..it is the only light in this darkness.

Answer 4

Butter Chicken!!

Answer 5

Delicious.

Answer 6

He would be a sumptuous roast leg of Lamb!!!

Answer 7

A paper plate.

Answer 8

chocolate.

Answer 9

Your Lover





Nothing will be Your Lover if Your Lover cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."








Your Lover as "part & whole"


Your Lover cannot be as part if nothing includes Your Lover. As wholes include Your Lover, Your Lover is as part.
Your Lover cannot be as whole if nothing composes Your Lover. As parts compose Your Lover, Your Lover is as whole.
What are the parts of Your Lover if Your Lover is as whole composed of parts?
What are the wholes of Your Lover if Your Lover is as part included in wholes?
How are the parts that compose Your Lover sensed?
How are the wholes that include Your Lover sensed?




Your Lover as "equivalence & uniqueness"


Your Lover cannot be as equivalence if nothing distinguishes Your Lover. As differences distinguish Your Lover, Your Lover is as equivalence.
Your Lover cannot be as uniqueness if nothing equates Your Lover. As equivalences equate Your Lover, Your Lover is as uniqueness.
What are the equivalences of Your Lover if Your Lover is as uniqueness equated by equivalences?
What are the differences of Your Lover if Your Lover is as equivalence distinguished by differences?
How are the equivalences that equate Your Lover sensed?
How are the differences that distinguish Your Lover sensed?




Your Lover as "limit & link"


Your Lover cannot be as link if nothing limits Your Lover. As limits limit Your Lover, Your Lover is as link.
Your Lover cannot be as limit if nothing links Your Lover. As links link Your Lover, Your Lover is as limit.
What are the links of Your Lover if Your Lover is as limit linked by links?
What are the limits of Your Lover if Your Lover is as link limited by limits?
How are the limits that limit Your Lover sensed?
How are the links that link Your Lover sensed?




Your Lover as "sensation & influence"


Your Lover cannot be as sensation if nothing influences Your Lover. As influences influence Your Lover, Your Lover is as sensation.
Your Lover cannot be as influence if nothing senses Your Lover. As sensations sense Your Lover, Your Lover is as influence.
What are the sensations of Your Lover if Your Lover is as influence sensed by sensations?
What are the influences of Your Lover if Your Lover is as sensation influenced by influences?
How are the sensations that sense Your Lover sensed?
How are the influences that influence Your Lover sensed?




Your Lover as "origin & derivative"


Your Lover cannot be as origin if nothing inherits Your Lover. As derivatives inherit Your Lover, Your Lover is as origin.
Your Lover cannot be as derivative if nothing originates Your Lover. As origins originate Your Lover, Your Lover is as derivative.
What are the origins of Your Lover if Your Lover is as derivative derived by origins?
What are the derivatives of Your Lover if Your Lover is as origin inherited by derivatives?
How are the origins that derive Your Lover sensed?
How are the derivatives that inherit Your Lover sensed?




Your Lover as "rule & condition"


Your Lover cannot be as rule if nothing conditions Your Lover. As conditions condition Your Lover, Your Lover is as rule.
Your Lover cannot be as condition if nothing rules Your Lover. As rules rule Your Lover, Your Lover is as condition.
What are the rules of Your Lover if Your Lover is as condition ruled by rules?
What are the conditions of Your Lover if Your Lover is as rule conditoned by conditions?
How are the rules that rule Your Lover sensed?
How are the conditions that condition Your Lover sensed?




Your Lover as "intent & fulfillment"


Your Lover cannot be as intent if nothing fulfills Your Lover. As fulfillments fulfill Your Lover, Your Lover is as intent.
Your Lover cannot be as fulfillment if nothing intends Your Lover. As intents intend Your Lover, Your Lover is as fulfillment.
What are the intents of Your Lover if Your Lover is as fulfillment intended by intents?
What are the fulfillments of Your Lover if Your Lover is as intent fulfilled by fulfillments?
How are the intents that intend Your Lover sensed?
How are the fulfillments that fulfill Your Lover sensed?






Nothing will be Your Lover if Your Lover cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."