English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-24 20:03:10 · 6 answers · asked by Discovery 5 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

6 answers

Too big for a large-hearted and too small for a lean-hearted.

2007-08-28 14:40:54 · answer #1 · answered by Ishan26 7 · 0 0

The world is too small because the land area of the world is far reach from the size area of sea and oceans. Look at China, they are fully populated and the size of their area doesn't grow. There will reach a time if we do not get serious of the booming population more people will suffer, more hungry mouths, famine and this you will see a country-world of poverty at its best.

2007-08-25 03:28:18 · answer #2 · answered by Third P 6 · 0 0

the world was here first why arent we asking if the population is too big or too small? why would it be the worlds fault??

2007-08-25 12:53:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This world is not to be critique as too big or too small, this world is what it is, we label it what we wish, but it remains unchange.

2007-08-25 04:19:52 · answer #4 · answered by got_chillz 2 · 0 0

It's too medium.

2007-08-25 03:12:30 · answer #5 · answered by pedestrian 3 · 0 0

This World





Nothing will be This World if This World cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."








This World as "part & whole"


This World cannot be as part if nothing includes This World. As wholes include This World, This World is as part.
This World cannot be as whole if nothing composes This World. As parts compose This World, This World is as whole.
What are the parts of This World if This World is as whole composed of parts?
What are the wholes of This World if This World is as part included in wholes?
How are the parts that compose This World sensed?
How are the wholes that include This World sensed?




This World as "equivalence & uniqueness"


This World cannot be as equivalence if nothing distinguishes This World. As differences distinguish This World, This World is as equivalence.
This World cannot be as uniqueness if nothing equates This World. As equivalences equate This World, This World is as uniqueness.
What are the equivalences of This World if This World is as uniqueness equated by equivalences?
What are the differences of This World if This World is as equivalence distinguished by differences?
How are the equivalences that equate This World sensed?
How are the differences that distinguish This World sensed?




This World as "limit & link"


This World cannot be as link if nothing limits This World. As limits limit This World, This World is as link.
This World cannot be as limit if nothing links This World. As links link This World, This World is as limit.
What are the links of This World if This World is as limit linked by links?
What are the limits of This World if This World is as link limited by limits?
How are the limits that limit This World sensed?
How are the links that link This World sensed?




This World as "sensation & influence"


This World cannot be as sensation if nothing influences This World. As influences influence This World, This World is as sensation.
This World cannot be as influence if nothing senses This World. As sensations sense This World, This World is as influence.
What are the sensations of This World if This World is as influence sensed by sensations?
What are the influences of This World if This World is as sensation influenced by influences?
How are the sensations that sense This World sensed?
How are the influences that influence This World sensed?




This World as "origin & derivative"


This World cannot be as origin if nothing inherits This World. As derivatives inherit This World, This World is as origin.
This World cannot be as derivative if nothing originates This World. As origins originate This World, This World is as derivative.
What are the origins of This World if This World is as derivative derived by origins?
What are the derivatives of This World if This World is as origin inherited by derivatives?
How are the origins that derive This World sensed?
How are the derivatives that inherit This World sensed?




This World as "rule & condition"


This World cannot be as rule if nothing conditions This World. As conditions condition This World, This World is as rule.
This World cannot be as condition if nothing rules This World. As rules rule This World, This World is as condition.
What are the rules of This World if This World is as condition ruled by rules?
What are the conditions of This World if This World is as rule conditoned by conditions?
How are the rules that rule This World sensed?
How are the conditions that condition This World sensed?




This World as "intent & fulfillment"


This World cannot be as intent if nothing fulfills This World. As fulfillments fulfill This World, This World is as intent.
This World cannot be as fulfillment if nothing intends This World. As intents intend This World, This World is as fulfillment.
What are the intents of This World if This World is as fulfillment intended by intents?
What are the fulfillments of This World if This World is as intent fulfilled by fulfillments?
How are the intents that intend This World sensed?
How are the fulfillments that fulfill This World sensed?






Nothing will be This World if This World cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, link, limit, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment."

2007-08-25 03:52:07 · answer #6 · answered by The Knowledge Server 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers