Does ontogeny recapitulate phylogeny? Does the biogenetic law exist?

Answer 1

"From the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female..."-- Jesus (Mk. 10:6)

Its that simple .

Similarity doesn't mean common origin, it means a common Designer.

Answer 2

I see Rev.Albert is here telling lies. The evolution of the horse has never I repeat never been disproven. I know people like him claim this nonsense,but I challenge you to show your proof. I will not accet anything from http://www.answersingenesis or any other xtian website,as these are unscientific websites. So with that in mind put up or shut up.I can find a whole lot more sites like these Rev.Al. If you people have the truth why do you have to lie to try and convince others?

Just because you misquote or take something Eldrige said out of context does not make you truthful. Niles has often complained about the creationist taking things he said and distorting it. It doesn't make you right it only makes you creative liars. This happens to be one of the most infamous misquotes ever. He wasn't saying that the evolution of horses did not happen,but that it did not happen in a strictly linear fashion. You people should be ashamed of yourselves for the fraudlent manner that you deal with scientists. Your own Holy Book tells you not to lie,but you do it when it suits you. Shame on you. You are worse than a politician. I dare you to put the entire essay on here without the editorializing. Did you insert fantasy in brackets like that? I would bet that you did,because I have seenthat exact same statement without the word fantasy in brackets.

Quote mining is a dirty little tactic your ilk have been using for a long time. Darwin's "Origin Of the Species" is a prime example. You take a quote by Darwin about the evolution of the eye,and make it seem that Darwin did not believe it himself. You are the most dishonest people in the world. You have a lot in common with religious fanatics in the Middle East.

Here's another link for you.Try reading this.See if you can find something here that you can misquote.

Answer 3

not precisely, no. haeckel thought that instructions could only be added to the end of the developmental recipe. this is understandable because the discovery of DNA was over 50 years away at that time, but he was wrong. there is often a rough correspondence, but it's not absolute as haeckel thought.

Answer 4

If you can ask that question, then u know darn well that it doesn't recapitulate.

Answer 5

If you can ask such a question you can answer it.