Who told you that? You are not very informed. President Bush was reelected because of his leadership.
Quite honestly he is a cowboy and American's love a cowboy. He is not killing thousands of people a day. I don't know where you got that number. He was also elected due to the fact the most people really didn't like John Kerry and when given the choice between John Kerry and George Bush they chose George Bush. And everyone should be very thankful of that - can you image what it would have been like with John Kerry in office?
2007-08-24 18:16:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jonny Jonny 2
·
6⤊
2⤋
He is not a murder. the Clinton's and the Communist left are. Because slick Willy did nothing in the 90's we got hit first twin towers attack, Mogadishu, 2 embassies, the USS Cole. And in Osma bin laden's words the Americans are cowards. He was right about you spineless commies. But the the real America as we are not losers like you on the left. As you own defeat. And we own victory.
Go Bush and if we are attacked again look out as Biliary said it would help the right which is spin as she knows we are winning, but if we are attacked and this will be much worse than Marshall law will be in and Bush will be for the long haul. So surrender to the Muslims as we will never or to the left.
2007-08-25 00:43:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Your numbers are off, yet to why did he get re-elected. They have been nonetheless easily apprehensive, and from there the main cynical appeals to pathos have been helpful. it incredibly is no longer so diverse from what the Democrats (then out of style) did throughout the Eisenhower administration with all their talk approximately how the Soviet Union became into going to anihilate us via fact they have been so a methods forward individuals technologically, and that became into customarily to blame for ushering interior the chilly warfare. In the two circumstances the methods have been similiar: scare the crap out of people and then smear your fighters with baseless own assaults and strawman charicatures of their coverage positions. the only distinction became into the Democrats have been doing it via fact they have been out of capacity, and that they needed capacity, and this final time the Republicans have been already in capacity, yet they needed extra capacity, and then after the Iraq fiasco, they have been desperately attempting to hold onto capacity.
2016-11-13 08:57:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wars have been going on for centuries. Get over it. You think we are just going to sit back and let people attack us and do nothing about it. We are trying to create a democracy in the middle east. If we pulled out now all of our work would be ruined.
2007-08-24 18:17:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by RedWhite&Blue 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Well, a lot of his lies and scandals didn't get exposed until the democratic congress, which was two years to late. B4 2006, the republican congress was covering Bush's *** for him.
2007-08-25 01:08:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Allen Carlson 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ignorance
2007-08-24 19:08:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Marissa M 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
You need look no further than who was running against him.
2007-08-25 02:41:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by gunplumber_462 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Supreme Court gave him the White House? And he stole the 2nd Term with the computer system? You figure it out. What do you think? Wish I had done it this way.
2007-08-24 18:09:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Here's a fresh and unique question no one on Y!A has asked yet!
2007-08-24 18:08:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I don't think you understand the term war!
2007-08-24 18:09:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by josh m 5
·
6⤊
1⤋