With the plea agreement being worked out, it is indicated that although he is suspended from the NFL and will most likely be imprisoned, there is a likelihood that he will return to football after his prison sentence is served. In a statement made, it was expressly indicated that he did not 'bet' on the outcome of the fights as this would render him unable to return. Now, look at Pete Rose, he denied, then later admitted that he gambled and bet on baseball, although not on the teams he was involved with at the time. He has been banned for life from baseball and can never be admitted to the Hall of Fame for all that he did do right in the sport. He bet, but never harmed another living thing by doing it. Shouldn't Vick be subjected to the same criteria as Pete Rose? Should the NFL look to the MLB for their lead in such a case?
2007-08-24
17:56:19
·
2 answers
·
asked by
momatad
4
in
Sports
➔ Other - Sports