If national security is so important to most Americans, would Hillary do a good job protecting America?

Question

I'll probably sound sexist, but how can Hillary seriously handle going on the offensive against terrorism? How would an American woman president be seen by Muslim countries such as Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, and list goes on? Would Hillary's Presidential presence embolden "the enemy"?

Answer 1

The problem is NOT that she is a woman, women can be ruthless! (and often are).
The problem is she has an agenda based on Socialist/Marxist philosophies. She wants to take your Constitutionally guaranteed power from you and use it to implement her own potentially tyrannical agenda.
Never forget what power you possess. You have freedom of speech.
You have money. (Money is a form of power and to the degree you have money, they don't have it and you can use it to fight against tyranny).
You have property. You have the right to bear arms.
NEVER vote for anyone who advocates more gun control, or restrictions on speech in ANY of its forms.
Reject anyone wanting to raise taxes. That takes your power and puts it in their pockets.
The same for anyone wanting to restrict your property rights.
Throw ALL of them out of office.
THEY ARE TYRANTS!

Answer 2

Yes of course I know she could. Pee Wee Herman would do a better job than Bush protecting this country Bush and Co are the terrorist that have destroyed the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and Habeus Corpus and the Passe Commitatus act of 1873 that prevented federal troops from acting like law enforcement and squashing civil disobedience. Wire tapping American citizens without a warrant. She wouldnt do that.

I don't support her now but would in the general election cause anything is better than a republican unless its ron paul or chuck hager.

Answer 3

Yes, you do sound sexist.

You don't have to be a big macho man to tell other people what to do to protect this country. You just have to be SMART, and like it or not, Hillary is smarter than the sad sack we have in office right now...so she'd do a much better job.

There are other female heads of state and Presidents of other countries and they are thriving, not falling apart.

Please, stop with the sexism. Give women a chance. You big macho men have had your chance and everything is going to hell.

Thank you for you time, I know you don't have much time for females.

Answer 4

This invoice would not could desire to be handed to ward off a terrorist attack. Thats the 1st LIE. and individuals are procuring it. Secondly, the only purpose of the Act is take care of Bush's cohorts interior the invasion of privateness perpetrated via those agencies on behalf of the Bush administration.

Answer 5

Anyone but Hillary 08

Answer 6

She wouldn't be the first female head of state. Margaret Thatcher, for example, never struck me as sweet and fuzzy...

Answer 7

no matter who it is they will do a bad job. that is what i hate about voting. no one can do a good job. they are all phonies