That is the lifers..........should they be used to test new drugs for the rest of the population?
2007-08-24 14:12:34 · 13 answers · asked by Nagitar™ 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Hell no. There is something just morally disturbing about this practice...and in all parts of the world, too! Nagitar, you've heard of those exhibits involving the use of human cadavers for artistic purpose, right? You know--Gunther Von Hagen’s anatomical, Body Worlds exhibit from Berlin, Germany; where they use human corpses to display the "wonders of anatomy". Well, in Berlin they supposedly had the consent of their subjects; but in Asia, this "consent clause" doesn't exist. There are several "copycat" exhibits, which use Chinese executed prisoners as exhibit specimens. One just recently opened up in our town, and I KNOW FOR A FACT..that these are prisoners which were executed and sold for science (the museum director told me). GAH! There's something morbid about knowing that some guy, who was innocently persecuted in communist China for doing God-knows-what, is now sitting in a museum, modeled as the "Thinker" playing a game of chess...while his mother, somewhere in Xia He, China, is wondering where he is.
2007-08-24 20:06:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
A- in the event that they already had a affliction and chosen to partake then no it truly is thoroughly ethical and lawful. only like if somebody have been to be a guinea pig for clean antibiotics. B- that form of relies upon on the reimbursement given. C- If it exposes them to wellbeing hazards then that's what a consent sort is for. i'd get a video on tape of them consenting besides as a written letter. Then have it evaluated to verify there is not any longer something that provides off the effect of duress As for sorting out issues like CS gas no this is unlawful and unethical.
2016-12-12 11:21:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Usually, and they should all be wearing IPODs with 600 recordings of William Shatner singing Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, with the volume turned up to 11.
2007-08-24 19:24:32 · answer #3 · answered by NONAME 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Some of them do sign up to be paid by drug company's as test subjects, but here we are again, are they really mentally stable to get accurate test results from?
2007-08-24 14:53:01 · answer #4 · answered by SP Addict 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
either that or send them to war on the front lines! let them die first, if any are to die!
rapists and killers that is, not just the petty drug pusher!~
2007-08-24 14:41:26 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sure, this would be more accurate than using animals. We also would not have to pay them.
2007-08-25 13:15:55 · answer #6 · answered by Pip 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why not its not like they are going any where
besides might make up for the wrong they did
2007-08-24 15:13:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
no i don't . i have no use for baby rapers or killers, but i say if they are on death row, just execute them. to all the people saying to put the killers out to war....get real. you want to give killers automatic weapons? think people.
2007-08-24 19:21:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
maybe they already paid for by us
2007-08-24 23:27:21 · answer #9 · answered by fayem7 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no... they do not deserve a chance to get a buzz
2007-08-24 19:31:27 · answer #10 · answered by rosey 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋