English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The experts say this will be the case and that Bush is and has been building a case against Iran, especially since he named Iran's Revolutionary Guards terrorists and the new NIE reports. They also say the attack will be in the next 6 months. What do you think?

2007-08-24 14:07:36 · 30 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government Politics

30 answers

I do and this is why...

http://www.physics911.net/nuclearfalseflag

http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGkiclgc9GQWMBMxBXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTE5ajAxMWMzBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMwRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkA1NTMDFfMTA4BGwDV1Mx/SIG=13keecgol/EXP=1188090533/**http%3a//www.globalresearch.ca/index.php%3fcontext=viewArticle%26code=TRE20070401%26articleId=5245

2007-08-24 14:13:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

The Bush handlers have to come up with a plausible reason for such an invasion. They can't admit it's all for the same reasons we invaded Iraq: OIL and WAR PROFITEERING.
So, I believe they will stage another 'terrorist' attack on U.S. soil - this time in the Midwest (perhaps St. Louis or Chicago) so that the emotional upheaval has more impact than it does when it affects New York City.

I would not expect that to happen until the spring of 2008, possibly even summer (just prior to the political conventions). Then Bush will be ordered (by the wealthy elitists, industrialists and power brokers who actually control this nation) to declare martial law. Since Bush just recently eliminated the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, he can now declare martial law without even seeking Congressional approval or authorization!

Bush will claim that the 'terrorist attack' prevents a change in administrations because it's in the best interests of national security. He will federalize all reserve units and instill an atmosphere of abject fear in most gullible Americans. Then he will invade Iran and commit a military presence there for decades - or generations, just as he has in Iraq - until we've sucked every drop of OIL from those two countries' sands.

The ONLY thing that might prevent this scenario from happening: the Bush puppeteers might come to believe that the nation's worst economic depression in history will hit America shortly after Bush leaves office (which I think is highly like by 2010). If they believe that to be the case, you will see only a MilqueToast attempt on the part of Republicans to win any of the '08 elections. They'll let the Democrats win, let the Democrats get blamed for the depression, and then come back strong in 2012.

There's another 'variable' that will be played out in October or November of 2007: approximately two million Americans are in danger of losing their homes because they won't be able to make their fall mortgage payments.
This could cause an economic collapse of dramatic proportions, which could result in voters calling for Bush's impeachment before the end of his term.

By the way, if your avatar is a real picture of you, you're a very attractive woman!!! -RKO- 08/24/07

2007-08-24 14:27:37 · answer #2 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3 0

They have had their eyes on Iran for a very, very long time. They have threatened Iran throughout this whole Iraq thing and, of course, when Iran builds up weapons and takes steps to bolster their defences against an armed force that is on their borders and threatening them, the US Government say they are a threat to US liberty and so have the perfectly acceptable excuse to invade and fight them.
It has all been planned very well and almost everybody, including the Iranians, have fallen into the trap. YES. The Bush administration will launch an attack into Iran before the end of its run. It has been working up to that objective for a very long time.

2007-08-24 14:32:55 · answer #3 · answered by cutsie_dread 5 · 1 0

"Congress would never allow it; besides, the American people would become enraged."

Hmmmm...that didn't happen with Iraq which was completely based on lies and deception. Iran will be attacked before Bush is gone. The problem is that by declaring the Revolutionary Guard to be terrorists, Bush is saying that hey is not going to abide by the Geneva Conventions. How does the US expect their captured troops to be treated in returns?

If Iran gets attacked, mideast oil could be cut off for a long time. The world will go into recession and the whole world will be pissed at the US. US citizens for the most part will listen to propaganda on FOX and call the French wusses and blindly believe anything they're told by their regime. They'll then vote in another neocon republican congress and president who will continue to erode democracy and accountability of gov't to the people.

2007-08-24 14:25:16 · answer #4 · answered by USA_USA_USA 2 · 3 1

If Bush and Corruption create a War with Iran, Bush and his cronies may very well face War Crimes against Humanity brought against them by members of the different 193 countries who signed the Geneva Convention in 1949.

This world does not need any more war and Bush and his cronies may very well face charges from the World Courts in the Hague, Netherlands once they leave office. They are not above International Law and Bush and his PNAC Cabal better realize that as they are War Criminals just like the Nazis who were tried and hung at the Nuremberg Trials in 1946.

2007-08-24 14:26:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

you're genuine that Christians must be waiting for Christ to return any time. The Bible tells us to realize this. so a ways as Bush attacking Iran---quite often, the final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days of a presidency is a "coaster". the two by way of fact he's drained, he has completed what he had to do, or he now no longer has the rustic in the back of him. i could say Bush fits into all 3 of those categories. so a ways as Russia and China attacking the U. S., we consistently pay attention adverse stuff approximately our united states, yet make no mistake approximately it, we are nonetheless a important means interior the worldwide. human beings run to us for what they desire, yet they do no longer prefer to combat us.

2016-10-16 22:01:34 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well, I did expect the US to attack Iran since January, because of the new aircraft carrier dispatch in the region (they have 2 now). Those two alone are enough to project power and destroy Iran by bombardments only... Bush will not resist long time before playing with his new toys... Get out of Iraq... NO problems, enter IRAN.... This is the EXIT strategy of Bush...

2007-08-24 15:48:56 · answer #7 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 0 0

I don't believe he will for the simple reason that he is in such deep **** in Iraq he can't afford to. However if he did it would prove beyond doubt that he is as big a menace as Malcolm Frazer has described him. It is probable that the American public would riot in the streets. At least I hope they would.
Did anybody see the documentary on SBS the other night? It was quite clear from that that there wasn't an American general who had a clue how to handle the situation and the plan was that they had no plan at all . How many generals have they gone through now trying to sort it out?

2007-08-25 00:42:25 · answer #8 · answered by Ted T 5 · 1 0

I don't know, but I'm not so sure that Iraq wasn't part of a plan to attack Iran. If you look at a map of the middle east, Afghanistan and Iraq pretty much completely cut Iran off from the mainland. I think conflict with Iran is inevitable. It's either going to be our generation, or the next. But to answer your question, I would be surprised if Pres. Bush attacks Iran, but I wouldn't be surprised if he makes some tough demands on Iran, before he leaves.

2007-08-24 14:14:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Well instead of stating all the reasons I believe its going to happen before January , just read this -

BOB Baer, the former Middle East CIA operative whose first book about his life inspired the oil-and-espionage thriller Syriana, is working on a new book on Iran, but says he was told by senior intelligence officials that he had better get it published in the next couple of months because things could be about to change.

Baer, in an interview with The Weekend Australian, says his contacts in the administration suggest a strategic airstrike on Iran is a real possibility in the months ahead.

"What I'm getting is a sense that their sentiment is they are going to hit the Iranians and not just because of Israel, but due to the fact that Iran is the predominant power in the Gulf and it is hostile and its power is creeping into the Gulf at every level," Baer says.

He says his contacts have told him of his book: "You better hurry up because the thesis is going to change. I told them submission is in January but they said, 'You're probably going to be too late'."

- Above is from an article I just read , click - http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22303955-26397,00.html -

2007-08-25 10:27:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It could very well happen ... he doesn't have much to loose from American people, he is not running for reelection anyway. He has already shown utter disregard to opinions of American people. Other republicans in his party also doesn't have much control. Short of impeaching him you can't stop him, but then by impeaching him you will have Cheney as president who is itching to attack Iran.

The so-called 'mainstream' media has also increased reporting on 'how Iran is behind american soliders being killed in Iraq' ... those right wing idiot talk show hosts have started 'reporting' on how life in Iran is unfair for common people.

Seems eerily similar to the run-up to Iraq war !!!

2007-08-24 14:46:36 · answer #11 · answered by I could care less 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers