Almost all the time I hear democrats responding with name calling and making statements about issues off the topics of questions instead of addressing questions. Why is this such a common tool for the democrats? Is it because they have absolutely nothing to support the actions of the dems or because they do not know how to interpret facts?
2007-08-24 12:31:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
What are the democrats doing to preserve then? Sinking their approval rating lower and lower into the Earth in order to fertilize it?
2007-08-24 13:00:55 · update #1
Nobody is forcing uneductated, unemployed, unwed women to have sex or to get pregnant.
The irony of this is, the Dems want to tell you that you can smoke as long as you pay more for it, but you can't smoke in public, you can't smoke in your car, or a lot of places.
The dems want to tell you that you can eat whatever you want, except, trans fat because, Universal health care isn't set up for covering people who eat trans fat or something, w/e is the excuse for that spin?
2007-08-24 13:03:02 · update #2
They also want to tell you that, they are for supporting the poor people of the USA while letting illegal immigrants under cut the same people they represent and force them to work for less and less because, thats how you improve poor peoples lives, by making them poorer.
2007-08-24 13:04:29 · update #3
pffft!
Unlike republicans, of course, who won't allow any Democrats into their speeches and rallys. Right?
2007-08-24 12:36:21 · answer #1 · answered by Jason 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Where are you getting your information? Star?
None of it is true. The Republicans and Bush administration are pretty bad at name calling too. I think it is what small minded folks do to avoid the issue. What is wrong with talking about an issue? I know I don't have all the answers. How can you be so sure that you do? Where are you getting your information? How many different sources? How many people have you spoken to about this? Do they all think like you? Have you questioned your beliefs at all? It does not sound like it to me and that's why I'm saying this. I know for a fact that your allegations are untrue. The democrats are trying to make life better for the illegals because that will directly improve the lives of Americans. How? Because unscrupulous employers won't be able to get their labor for so cheap. Democrats recognize our society is imperfect and that a lot of the social problems we have are a result of it. They are working for the people. Republicans are working for the corporations. I thought that was best at one time but due to the shape of the world and the more I learn about corporations the more I see that our quality of life will be in the toilet very soon. Bush seems incapable of discussing anything important. He's been on vacation way too much during a time when we need him working. We are paying his salalry by the way. I want him working more than I work.
2007-08-28 09:33:28 · answer #2 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because his libertarian idealism is irrevlant according to the media because it doesn't go along with the 2 party dictatorship set in place. The elections have been set up since the 1980's that only the 2 main parties are allowed at the debates unless a third party canidiate got enough votes to require federal funds. He tried suing them but the bankers that run the show kept him and others with his political beliefs out so they can stay in power to put in totalairian Orwellian socialist police state. Do you really think Mitt Romney was the republican with the most support? Because he wasn't.
2016-05-17 07:10:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe because the cons spin everything thier way.For instance;Cons claim they are pro-life.........while insinuating the the dems are pro-abortion.While the dems say they are pro-choice.Which if you stop and think about it isn't the same thing.Pro-choice means that each woman should have the right to make that choice for themselves.Pro-lifers think that it is prefectly fine for the government to force unwed,under educated women to have children!Personally I don't believe in abortion.I think if a woman doesn't want a child she should keep her legs closed............or at least use birth control if she can't!
2007-08-24 12:59:47 · answer #4 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are like salesmen with nothing good to sell. They try and shine the light on negatives about other products when offering theirs with no good things to say about it. If they did not already control the Media those debates would not clog up the airways. Anyone that thinks those questions are not personally approved by Clinton campaign staffers is very naive.
2007-08-24 13:50:56 · answer #5 · answered by old codger 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunetly they have been afraid to address the fact that the tyrant who currently occupies the post they are seeking has come very close to destroying the earth, and is an abomination to all mankind. They should be talking about how they will repair the damage that this monster has done.
2007-08-24 12:36:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They wouldnt know a fact if it bit them on the nose. They think facts are created if they just repeat something over and over again. Thats the problem when you have a world view built on "relative" truth. its unstainable and easily manipulated to ignore the facts.
2007-08-24 22:41:11 · answer #7 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
my my my, aren't we prejudiced.
You should come here earlier in the day- it's loaded with neocons. I'm sure you'd fit right in.
2007-08-24 13:20:53 · answer #8 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's all Obama talks about. Have you listened to him speak?
2007-08-24 12:42:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Facts only if they make them???
2007-08-24 12:57:46 · answer #10 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋