You are totally wacked on weed. Weed wacked?.
2007-08-24 12:30:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by mstrywmn 7
·
7⤊
6⤋
What has the right done in the last 6 years?Destroying us from the inside?How come only PUBLIC pressure forced the de-classifying of the PDR of 8/2001 stating "bin laden determined to strike inside US"?How many other bland documents have been classified so the administration doesn't look bad?Why did it take more then a year for the GOP controlled government to open an investigation into what happened on 9/11?Again the only reason there was an investigation was because of PUBLIC PRESSURE!Even the co-chairs of the 9/11 commission said it was set up to fail? Then a con like you would call someone else a lair!The GOP likes to call themselves cons......
2007-08-24 12:48:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by honestamerican 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
A vote for Hillary is a vote for hope and the future!
Hillary realizes that the modern American is simply to lazy and unconcerned with the basic realities of life, such as getting proper health care, and keeping ones skills current to mitigate a loss of employment. Therefore, she's just taking the natural solution to the problem: taking the decision making away from the average person.
You gotta admit the brilliance of it. The average American can't find Germany on a map, is a monolingual dolt, and would rather spend time shopping for pretty trinkets than spending an hour researching candidates. So, why even pretend anymore that we're part of an informed electorate.
Bush is completely out of synch with the times. He wants America to be like Superman and defend the defenseless. That is so 1950s! It's corny. America should spend its dwindling capital reserves on all the out of wedlock babies the Liberals told us were no cause for shame.
A vote for Hillary is the only solution. Liberals have charted us a course for mediocrity, with Hillary at the helm, we can go full speed ahead to the land of soy milk and an imitation, non-sugar, honey-byproduct.
Vote For Hillary. Thinking is such a waste of effort.
2007-08-24 12:42:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
What are you smoking?
Only the most uninformed and partisan of lunatics would call Senator Clinton a communist. Have you any idea what communism actually is, or do you rely on Joe McCarthy for your definitions?
Like so many of the doctrinaire Republicans you are a name caller without any understanding of the names you use. It is like listening to six year olds use their Daddy's swear words.
Those who have actually read Marx and Lenin and know what they advocated realize that the differences between Republicans and Democrats are merely small doctrinal squabbles between committed capitalists. It is more like the differences in opinion between the Baptists and the Pentecostals than anything else.
Of course, few Republicans or Democrats have any understanding of Adam Smith or John Locke, either. We throw words like communist and fascist about without any inkling of what we are saying. It probably comes from political interference in the school curriculum. There is no honest discussion of where the various philosophies come from or mean, so the American people remain uninformed.
By calling Hillary Clinton a communist you reveal the depth of your political ignorance, and undermine your entire argument.
However, let us look at the inference that the Senator favours the future Orwell feared. Was it the Clinton administration that introduced legislation curtailing civil liberties such as habeas corpus, enabling Big Brother to hold a citizen without trial? What about the removal of laws against random wiretapping and eavesdropping on unsuspecting members of the public?
Those prototalitarian changes were introduced by the Republicans under George W. Bush. It seems hypocritical in the extreme for an obvious supporter of the Bush League to criticize the Clintons when your own party has made such intrusions into personal privacy and freedoms. Further, if any President has ever practiced "newspeak" as defined in 1984, it is George W. Bush. You really need to think about where your party is taking you if you find Orwell's vision undesirable.
You did get one part right, however. We are approaching a critical time in the history of the world. China has a standing army in the millions, and is industrializing as fast as they can afford to. They are aggressively expanding into Tibet and Nepal, with eyes on Taiwan as well.
China is a totalitarian state on the lines of 1984. They confine their dissidents until they can find a buyer for their internal organs. Not even Hitler was that objectionable, yet we do so much business with them that we are actually funding their arms buildup.
What are we doing to prepare for the day China decides to take India, Burma, Taiwan or the Phillipines? Nothing. Instead we have a President who has sent the posse off to Iraq to revenge himself on some small time thugs who got lucky. Those thugs were not Iraqi, and in fact hated Saddam Hussien because he did not support their fundamentalist jihad, but we got rid of him anyway so that the Islamists could move into the power vaccuum.
Given that we will need all our strength and allies when the Chinese make their move, it seems like suicide to elect any more tinpot adventurers like the current incumbents. We need somebody whose vision is more about understanding than revenge, and whose aim is better.
I am not saying that is necessarily Mrs. Clinton. I am saying that you defame her with your ignorant assertions that she is either a communist or a totalitarian, and that the man you are supporting has defiled the Constitution in ways she never tried.
As for whether we would destroy ourselves from within, I would suggest that kind of destruction is more likely to come from the Conservatives that the Liberals. It was the Conservative dominated Democratic Party that allowed the nation to slide into the Civil War, rather than deal with the issue of emancipation. Today it is the Conservative dominated Republican Party that maintains the culture of character assassination and misplaced vilification that has made any reasoned debate and compromise impossible for the last sixteen years.
The only way to let the partisans know that we want a government that works for all the people after the votes are counted is to reject the philosophy of politics as a blood sport. Until an American can again object to the actions of their government without being accused of treason our republic is in peril, because men and women of principle will be intimidated from exercizing their right to free speech.
It would therefore be more truthful to suggest that we should vote Democrat and save ourselves from the new McCarthyites.
2007-08-24 13:37:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It is the neocons who have taken 1984 and turned it into the gospel according to Bush. No doubt, they wipe their asses with toilet paper on which the Bill of Rights has been printed. There's no question that this post is being spied on by their thugs. I'll vote for anybody who isn't a neocon and all Bush supporters and voters are neocons, so that rules out all of the Republican goon squad. If Hillary is the candidate, I vote for her.
2007-08-24 12:41:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by jhartmann21 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
I totally agree with you.
It would definitely be suicide.
I am voting republican in 2008 for the sake of our country.
I was born in 1984 BTW.
2007-08-24 13:05:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by I hate Hillary Clinton 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
We have already commit ed suicide of the earth by the double election of the current tyrant, deceiver, liar and abomination which occupies that post. A monster like this only comes around about once in one or two hundred years, so we can rest for at least a century after the tyrant is deposed.
As far as Hillary goes, get used to saying "President Clinton", and do it with a smile. She will be your near saviour after the quagmire of George Bush is forever washed off of the face of the earth.
2007-08-24 12:33:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Hahaha, funny. Too bad we already destroyed ourselves when Bush was elected, and you can't destroy something that's already destroyed. Voting republican won't save anyone from anything.
2007-08-24 13:01:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by :) 1
·
3⤊
2⤋
You forgot about her autographed copy of the Communist Manifesto. First Edition printing.
2007-08-24 12:43:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes! It would be worse than suicide to vote for Hillary. Don't!
Being conservative, I only appreciate the fact that Thompson might run, which is where my vote would go. If Thompson is not on the ticket, I will vote an Alumni, who is smarter than all candidates combined, and that is Obama.
2007-08-24 12:36:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I completely agree
2007-08-24 14:01:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Full Metal Jackson 3
·
2⤊
0⤋