Pretty good when he compares Iraq War to the Vietnam War and thus has upset Hanoi over doing so. This man has never had any credibility and his latest actions are the last grasp of reality of which he definitely never had a grasp of in the first place as he has never been responsible for his actions in his whole life.
Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20428097/
2007-08-24 11:18:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To Annie Oakley: Apparently you have never bothered to research the PNAC or the history of George Walker, **** Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld or the rest of the Chickenhawk Neocons that have belonged to Bush and Corruption. You like to condemn those that maybe have investigated a little bit, but you like to shoot off your mouth without ever bothering to check the truth of the lies behind the Iraq War as well as who the PNAC are and besides what there objectives are, but you maybe lack the skills to find out the truth or maybe you can't accept the truth.
Source: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
Source: http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
2007-08-24 13:21:11 · update #1
he could bring back the draft. he did say he wouldn't do that. but he also said saddam has wmd.
2007-08-24 11:25:54 · answer #1 · answered by soperson 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The more important question is, when will the democrats grow a a pair or two and have enough guts to do something about it.. Were not going to change GWB, he is a religious fanatic war criminal murdering scum, but when the democrats, concerned about illegal wire tapping, found the solution by legalizing it, that was the last straw..
Were doomed.
2007-08-24 11:29:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If GWB has any loyalty to his party he will at least consider drawing down troop levels by Christmas. As it is his policies have all but guaranteed a Democrat victory in Nov. 2008
2007-08-24 11:25:41 · answer #3 · answered by Yellow Dog 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL
I'd like to see you post your lame ideas of how you could be a better President. Start by listing your education, qualifications, and experience. Then enlighten us all with your "better" ideas. I'm sure you have many of them. I mean, after all, you feel qualified to criticize the COMMANDER IN CHIEF. sheesh What rock did you just climb out from under?
What did you say? You're not educated or qualified, and have no experience?? Oh! How shocking! You could have fooled me.
2007-08-24 11:44:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
So let's get this straight: today he's a "lame duck", which means (in part) that his party doesn't control congress; yesterday you libs were trying to say that you didn't really control Congress (to avoid having to explain the latest dismal approval numbers for Congress). So which is it? Do you libs control Congress or not?
2007-08-24 11:26:55 · answer #5 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If worse comes to worse my guess is he will lie on the floor and throw a tantrum like a little boy so he can get his way.
2007-08-24 11:31:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You might as well break down and buy a fiddle.
So far Congress has failed to actually do anything as they promised.
And they can't tie their shoes unless their hairdo's are paid for with tax money.
Bush has got it down with respect to allowing the libs to look like fools.
2007-08-24 11:22:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, he also said the Killing Fields, which he is historically wrong!
The Killing Fields were in Cambodia and Nixon was president at the time!
He never said "stay the course"!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bg1yY9rVGM
2007-08-24 11:26:34 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ignore the GOP's recommendation to pull out.
2007-08-24 12:25:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny how he outsmarts liberals every step of the way.
2007-08-24 11:27:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋