English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-24 10:32:59 · 19 answers · asked by looby 6 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

19 answers

Definitely....let the bastards rot,and get rid of this early release for good behaviour.If you are sent down for a specific length of time,then you should serve every single minute of that time.

2007-08-24 10:45:42 · answer #1 · answered by Crackerjack 3 · 2 1

Definately , but then do tax payers want to keep these people in prison or is there another solution , maybe it should be life for a life when it comes to murder . Other life sentences would have to depend on what they've done as to whether it means life .

2007-08-24 19:08:47 · answer #2 · answered by dmama81 2 · 0 0

Yes. Have to add though that the only way to safeguard the prison officers who would have to deal with them would be a very harsh regime where everything the prisoner had would be a privilege and if guards are attacked then all privileges would be removed for longer and longer periods dependant on compliance with rules.

2007-08-24 17:42:16 · answer #3 · answered by john m 6 · 2 0

Yes. Of course. If someone has been sentenced to life then it's for a crime that warrants taking away their liberty for a long period of time. Without making their lives inhumane in prison also, the period that they spend should not be all rosy with flat screen TVs and excercise classes

2007-08-24 17:41:33 · answer #4 · answered by Connors 1 · 1 0

YES...it would make a change.

what bugs me is some prisoners are allowed to appeal and have thier sentence reduced...but (not saying she should be allowed) but myra hindley wasnt allowed to appeal so why should other killers and such like.

life for a life means pay with your life.
bring back hanging i say...honestly...but mostly for little kid thugs showing guns on youtube...joke....not...

2007-08-24 17:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If you applied the trades descriptions act to prison sentences the judge would be locked up

2007-08-24 17:46:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Yes, why say life if its not life if its only 15 years then they should say 15 years or less with good behaviour

2007-08-24 17:41:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I agree - Life should be life! Not just how ever many years it is! Why is it called life if you do not even go in for life - Biggest scam since sliced bread

2007-08-24 17:42:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Life should mean life.

2007-08-24 17:44:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Life does mean life. If someone is sentenced to, say, 25 years to life, then, after 25 years, they become eligible for parole.

2007-08-24 17:45:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers