2007-08-24 08:32:24 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Looks bad from all angles from where I am looking. Worst is if Hillery wins ANOTHER term as president, she had her 8 years in office already.
2007-08-24 08:47:09 · answer #1 · answered by WC 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
A non election due to Executive orders being instituted and a Bush / Cheny stranglehold on govt. Then everything in the answer above would come into affect. Otherwise it would be like already posted, if any one of the current list of candidates were to win, Americans will lose. Since we are unable to secure our borders maybe we should just elect Vincente Fox.
Ron Paul and Mike Gravel are making some good points but in doing so will split votes and shoe in a less desirable person. Neither of them would have a chance of actually doing what they say and both would be assasinated upon their first attempt to change any policy the NWO has caused.
Thanks for the thumbs down Rudy lover, your candidate is as corrupt as Nixon was but not nearly as qualified for office.
2007-08-24 09:36:41 · answer #2 · answered by John S 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Five worst outcomes (from worst to least worse)
1. Ron Paul
2. Mike Gravel
3. Tom Tancredo
4. Sam Brownback
5. Dick Cheney
If we've learned anything the last 6 years, it's that competence is more important than a person's political beliefs. It would be nice to weed out the flakes quickly so we could discuss the real candidates.
Among the candidates with a realistic shot (top 4 declared candidates in each party), I'd say Mitt "the Varmint Hunter" Romney would be the worst option. Does he actually stand for anything other than his own ego?
Obama would be second worst, but that's because the field's finally getting narrow enough for political views to be considered. I would have serious doubts about both Obama and Edwards experience even if I agreed with their political views, but I'd at least consider both of them.
McCain, Giuliani, Huckabee, Richardson, and Clinton would all be competent and the choice between them comes down to which one I trust and which one has the political views I agree with most.
2007-08-24 08:57:12 · answer #3 · answered by Bob G 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The six worst outcomes, with no. 1 the worst, and no. 6 the least worst.
1. Obama
2. Ron Paul
3. Dick Cheney
4. Sam Brownback
5. Tom Tancredo
6. Milt Romney
2007-08-24 09:08:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If any of the major republican or democratic candidates win that will be the worst possible outcome.
The are all members of the CFR that seeks One World Government and is very deceptively hiding this.
The media and the government are all working together to take your rights away and divide the low class and high class even further and eliminate the middle class.
Why do you think Public schools are so bad in America? Because they government does not care. They want as many uneducated people who only learn about the dates of wars rather than what it takes to become happy and successfull.
They want to create workers not thinkers who will join the military.
They want a working class, military class and the small but all powerful elite and you my friend are assisting them.
Stop being manipulated and stop being a pawn.
Stop supporting wars that create havoc, death and chaos around the world.
War does not equal peace.
Support Ron Paul if anyone.
2007-08-24 08:49:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
i'm going to provide you the worst election: Hillary vs. Giuliani that's the worst effect genuine from the commencing up, and that i wouldn't likely care who have been given elected by way of fact the rustic could be in basic terms as undesirable under the two of them.
2016-10-16 21:37:47 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The worst possible election is one where any of the individuals running for office actually wins. No matter who wins, either party, that will be the worst possible outcome--they are all a bunch of power hungry crooks interested in lining their own pockets at the expense of everyone else.
2007-08-24 08:48:05 · answer #7 · answered by Mad Embalmer From the North 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bush declares marshal law, cancels the elections,declares him self king, and unleashes a military force on his own people to quash the nonbelievers,anti patriots, and terrorists everyones every step is , tracked, traced and monitered, the media all become one channel reporting the same thing, all news papers are under goverment rule, military service is manditory for all after thier 13th bithday ..........
what......
you said worst outcome.......
2007-08-24 09:31:53 · answer #8 · answered by nimisisprime 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
All politicians are bogus!
Do you reeeeeeaaaaally believe that either the "left" or the "right" are either one going to save your ***?
Save yourselves dam*it!!
Let's get rid of ALL of them!
We con't need another lawyer. We need the Doctor!
http://www.RonPaul2008.com
Dr. Ron Paul may be the last chance we have to keep from completely selling out the future of our country.
Look into him. Yes, he's technically a (R), but he's no lawyer!
I'm not extending a fist or a finger your way. I'm offering you my hand in true unity.
blogcharmdawtcawm/nostate
2007-08-24 09:53:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary as President, Obama as Vice President, and an all (or heavy majority) Democrat Senate and House.
Would be awful, would be the start of socialism in American and the end to individual freedom. And sadly, and ironically, the only thing to topple such a monstrosity would be the very enemies we fight today.
Not a good scenario.
But... it won't happen.
2007-08-24 08:38:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋